| TOPICS |
|
Principles |
| METHODS |
|
Meta model |
| USES |
| DEVELOPERS |
|
Richard Bandler |
| INFLUENCES |
|
Fritz Perls |
| LISTS |
|
view · talk
|
Sleight of Mouth is a system of language patterns for persuasion. Neuro-linguistic programming (or NLP) is an Interpersonal communication model applied in Psychotherapy and other contexts of communication and change The Worldview and working model of Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP covers the underlying Philosophy of NLP and how and why this philosophy is intended to be used This article discusses the history of the field known as Neuro-linguistic programming. This article is under development and also missing citations for certain statements Attempts at scientific studies of Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP The term "positive" is often used generally to mean "desirable" or "beneficial" and "negative" is usually used to mean "undesirable" or "bad" The meta-model in Neuro-linguistic programming (or meta-model of therapy is a Heuristic set of questions intended to elaborate and clarify information The Milton Model was co-created by John Grinder and Richard Bandler by modeling the hypnotic techniques of Milton H Therapeutic metaphor is a type of Conceptual metaphor presented as a story or other parallel to an entire aspect of a situation related by a psychotherapist to a Reframing is a technique in Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP where an undesirable behavior or trait is conferred a positive intention. Representational systems (also known as sensory modalities and abbreviated to VAKOG or known as the 4-tuple) is a Neuro-linguistic programming Meta-programs in general are programs that create control or make decisions about programs such as when and how to run them preferred and unpreferred programs and strategic A submodality in Neuro-linguistic programming is a distinction of Form or structure (rather than content within a sensory representational system. The therapeutic use of Neuro-Linguistic Programming is called NLP Therapy or Neurolinguistic Psychotherapy (NLPt. ATTENTION! PLEASE READ BEFORE EDITING Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! Please understand that this article is frequently vandalized and vandalism is reverted immediately John Grinder PhD (pronounced grin-der ˈgrɪndɚ born 1940 is an American Linguist, management consultant trainer and speaker Robert Dilts (born 1955 has been a developer author trainer and consultant in the field of Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP since its creation in 1975 by John Grinder Judith DeLozier is a trainer and author in Neuro-linguistic programming. Stephen G Gilligan PhD (born 1954 is an American Author, registered psychologist and psychotherapist Friedrich (Frederick Salomon Perls ( July 8 1893 Berlin – March 14 1970, Chicago better known as Fritz Perls, was a noted German Milton Hyland Erickson, MD (born 5 December 1901 in Aurum Nevada, died 25 March 1980 in Phoenix Arizona) was an Virginia Satir ( 26 June 1916 - 10 September 1988) was a noted American author and psychotherapist, known especially for In Linguistics, a transformational grammar, or transformational-generative grammar ( TGG) is a Generative grammar, especially of a Natural Gregory Bateson ( 9 May 1904 – 4 July 1980) was a British anthropologist, social scientist, linguist Alfred Habdank Skarbek Korzybski (kɔ'ʐɨpski ( July 3, 1879 &ndash March 1, 1950) was a Polish-American Philosopher This is a list of topics related to Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP A bibliography of books and articles about Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP List of studies on Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP summarizes the many studies that have been performed relevant to NLP since the early 1980s. The concept was devised by Robert Dilts who modelled the argument and persuasion skills of Richard Bandler (the co-founder of Neuro-linguistic programming). Robert Dilts (born 1955 has been a developer author trainer and consultant in the field of Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP since its creation in 1975 by John Grinder ATTENTION! PLEASE READ BEFORE EDITING Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! Please understand that this article is frequently vandalized and vandalism is reverted immediately Neuro-linguistic programming (or NLP) is an Interpersonal communication model applied in Psychotherapy and other contexts of communication and change By breaking down the methods, Dilts came up with 14 original patterns. [1] Others, such as Steve and Connirae Andreas, have added even more patterns beyond these original 14. Steve Andreas, born John O Stevens, is an American psychotherapist and Author specializing in Neuro-linguistic programming. Connirae Andreas is an American researcher and writer in the field of Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP [2]
As with other facets of the NLP system, the intention behind formalising the study of influence is to allow people to understand the process, and to duplicate those skills through the direct application of one or more of the Sleight Of Mouth patterns.
The name "Sleight of Mouth" builds off the phrase "Sleight of Hand" which refers to a magician's skills in making things happen which appear impossible. Sleight of hand, also known as prestidigitation ("quick fingers" or léger de main (from the French for "lightness of hand"
Contents |
Beliefs
Ultimately, Sleight of Mouth focuses on influence by challenging, and thus changing, beliefs.
Normally, a belief is simply something that you believe, like "I believe there is a God. " However, in Sleight of Mouth the concept of belief is built on a more specific set of definitions, as follows:
- Complex Equivalence: X=Y, or X is equivalent to Y
- Cause-Effect: X causes Y, X results in Y
Complex Equivalence and Cause-Effect can be seen in the following two examples, respectively.
- You're late again, which means you don't love me. (Note that this is not just "I believe you don't love me", but rather there is something which leads to that outcome. )
- I am not going to do that - [because] I am not that kind of person!
Patterns
A brief description of the key patterns appears below. However, most of the understanding will follow from working through examples, and seeing how these are applied.
- Intent: Focus on the intention behind the statement. This can be done by highlighting their positive intent behind the belief, or by challenging the negative intent.
- Consequences: Find a consequence (even an unintended consequence) which results in the belief being challenged. Unintended consequences are outcomes that are not (or not limited to what the actor intended in a particular situation
- Another Outcome: Maybe people who XYZ need ABC.
- Counterexample: Use an exception where their statement would not be true - which causes the belief that underlies the statement to be questioned. In Logic, and especially in its applications to Mathematics and Philosophy, a counterexample is an exception to a proposed general rule i
- Apply to self: Turn the comment back to them - by saying (or implying) that the consequence they suggest applies to you, actually applies to them for making the original statement.
- Reality strategy: Challenge the belief based on the fact that beliefs arise from certain perceptions. Ultimately, this is about asking how they know their belief is true, or what aspects of the belief are really the issue. (This is like the Metamodel. This is the concept of metamodeling in Computer science and related disciplines )
- Model of the World: Argue that they are saying that as a metaphor for something else.
- Meta frame: Challenge the basis behind the belief, rather than the belief. Suggest that their belief presupposes something.
- Change Frame Size: Extend the implications of the belief to a larger (or a smaller) scale; or to a larger (or shorter) time frame.
- Hierarchy of Criteria: Challenge the belief based on more important criteria, suggesting something more important they should be considering.
- Chunk Down: Look at a specific element and challenge the belief.
- Chunk Up: Generalise in order to challenge the belief. Generalization is a foundational element of Logic and human reasoning.
- Metaphor/Analogy: Use an example which challenges the belief. Metaphor (from the Greek: μεταφορά - metaphora, meaning "transfer" is language that directly compares seemingly unrelated subjects Analogy is both the cognitive process of transferring Information from a particular subject (the analogue or source to another particular subject (the target and
- Redefine: Use similar words to say the same thing, ensuring that the implication is changed. [1]
Example Sets
You're late again, which means you don't love me.
- Intent: I'm glad you care enough about me to be concerned about that.
- Consequence: You're just trying to get me to always fit within your timetable.
- Another Outcome: Would you have preferred me to cancel our dinner, if I knew I was going to be late?
- Counter Example: Have you ever loved someone, but still been late?
- Apply to Self: An accusation like that makes it sound like you don't love me.
- Reality Strategy: How did you come to that conclusion? Has someone accused you of something similar in the past?
- Model of the World: I'm guessing that it's not so much that I'm late, but you're concerned about me not focusing on the little things in our relationship.
- Meta frame: Where did you learn that being on time equates to love?
- Change Frame Size: Most people are late for meetings every day . . . are you saying that none of them care?
- Hierarchy of Criteria: Isn't it more important that I actually made the effort to get here, in spite of everything that happened along the way?
- Chunk Down: What about all the times I have been on time?
- Chunk Up: You're judging an entire relationship based on time-keeping?
- Metaphor/Analogy: Isn't that like saying if you don't cook for me every time, you don't love me?
- Redefine: You're saying a small delay defines an entire relationship?
I am not going to do that—I am not that kind of person!
- Intent: It's great that you make decisions based on how you see yourself as a person.
- Consequence: Why are you focused on decisions which avoid you having to leave the house?
- Another Outcome: But if you don't do that, can you ever hope to develop into the person you'd like to become?
- Counter Example: Have you ever done something that you didn't think was "you", yet you really enjoyed it?
- Apply to Self: You're not the kind of person to pre-judge, yet here you are - pre-judging.
- Reality Strategy: And exactly what kind of person do you have to be to do that kind of thing?
- Model of the World: Does everyone who is afraid to try something new say that?
- Meta frame: You're only saying that because you're afraid of what others might think.
- Change Frame Size: Yeah, that's right. Only a truly open-minded person would do that.
- Hierarchy of Criteria: What's more important, trying new things and expanding your horizons or being safe and restricted in your tiny comfort zone?
- Chunk Down: What kind of person would that make you, specifically?
- Chunk Up: Do you always get out of trying new things by making excuses?
- Metaphor/Analogy: People aren't born astronauts.
- Redefine: You don't have to tie up your identity with a few actions.
Notes and references
Further reading
- Dilts, Robert; Sleight of Mouth: The Magic of Conversational Belief Change (1999) ISBN 0-916990-43-5
See also
Links
- Website of Robert Dilts
- Using Language to Make Changes
- Sleight Of Mouth Patterns and Communication Patterns in Psychiatric Settings
Dapyx Software network: MP3 Explorer | Ebook Manager | Zenithic