| Murdock v. Pennsylvania | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
||||||||||
| Argued March 10-11, 1943 Decided May 3, 1943 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||
| Free Exercise claim upheld; A Pennsylvania ordinance imposing a license tax for those selling merchandise when such material is religious in nature violates the Free Exercise clause. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest judicial body in the United States and leads the federal judiciary. | ||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||
| Chief Justice: Harlan Fiske Stone Associate Justices: Owen Josephus Roberts, Hugo Black, Stanley Forman Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Frank Murphy, Robert H. Jackson, Wiley Blount Rutledge |
||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||
| Majority by: William O. Douglas |
Murdock v. Harlan Fiske Stone ( October 11 1872 – April 22 1946) was an American Lawyer and jurist. Hugo LaFayette Black (February 27 1886&ndashSeptember 25 1971 was an American politician and jurist. For the Indian newspaper editor and British politician see Stanley Reed. Felix Frankfurter ( November 15, 1882 – February 22, 1965) was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court William Orville Douglas ( October 16, 1898 – January 19, 1980) was a United States Supreme Court Associate Justice. William Francis (Frank Murphy ( April 13, 1890 July 19, 1949) was a Politician and Jurist from Michigan. Robert Houghwout Jackson ( February 13, 1892 &ndash October 9, 1954) was United States Attorney General (1940&ndash1941 and an Wiley Blount Rutledge Jr ( July 20, 1894 - September 10, 1949) was a U William Orville Douglas ( October 16, 1898 – January 19, 1980) was a United States Supreme Court Associate Justice. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held an ordinance requiring solicitors to purchase a license was an unconstitutional tax on the Jehovah's Witnesses' right to freely exercise their religion. Case citation is the system used in many countries to identify the decisions in past Court cases either in special series of books called reporters Year 1943 ( MCMXLIII) was a Common year starting on Friday (the link will display full 1943 calendar of the Gregorian calendar. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest judicial body in the United States and leads the federal judiciary.
Contents |
Facts of the case
The borough of Jeanette, Pennsylvania had an ordinance that required solicitors to purchase a license from the borough. Murdock was a Jehovah's Witness who asked for contributions in exchange for books and pamphlets. The city claimed that this meant that they were being sold and a license was required. At question was whether the licensing requirement constituted a tax on Murdock's religious exercise.
Decision of the Court
Justice William O. Douglas delivered the opinion of the Court. William Orville Douglas ( October 16, 1898 – January 19, 1980) was a United States Supreme Court Associate Justice. The court held that the ordinance was an unconstitutional tax on the Jehovah's Witnesses' right to freely exercise their religion.
The petitioners used the distribution of pamphlets and brochures as a form of missionary activity with an evangelical purpose. Not all behavior could be allowed by claiming that it was a religious activity. The only hold that spreading one's religious beliefs or preaching the Gospel through distribution of religious literature and through personal visitations is an age-old type of evangelism with as high a claim to constitutional protection as the more orthodox types. If the activity were done in order to raise money, it would be commercial and could be taxed. However, in this case, although donations were sought, the activity served a religious function. Religions are not entirely free from facing financial burdens from the government. It is one thing to impose a tax on the income or property of a preacher. It is quite another thing to exact a tax from him for the privilege of delivering a sermon. If the exercise can be taxed then the government is capable of making it prohibitively expensive and could only be done by the wealthy. The state claimed that this argument was unimportant because the tax was not expensive in practice. It is a license tax-a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights. A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution. The fact that the ordinance was imposed indiscriminately does not save it from being unconstitutional.
Minority opinions
Effects of the decision
Significance and critical response
Although it is not technically correct to say that this decision reversed Jones v. Opelika (1942), because the Court vacated Jones in a per curiam decision handed down the same day; in fact, that was the effect of this decision.
Murdock is a landmark decision which had the effect of allowing Jehovah's Witnesses and other religious groups who sold literature door-to-door to avoid paying licensing taxes to distribute their literature. The neutral imposition of the tax on solicitation performed by a religious group did not make it constitutionally acceptable. In addition, the Court drew a distinction between commercial activity and religious activity that involves the selling of religious literature.
Subsequent history
References
- ^ 319 U.S. 105 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw. com.
See also
External links
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 319 of the United States Reports: LDapyx Software network: MP3 Explorer | Ebook Manager | Zenithic