The Liberal welfare reforms (1906-1914[1]) collectively describes social legislation passed by the British Liberal Party after the 1906 General Election. Year 1906 ( MCMVI) was a Common year starting on Monday (link will display full calendar of the Gregorian calendar (or a Common year starting Year 1914 ( MCMXIV) was a Common year starting on Thursday (link will display the full calendar of the Gregorian calendar (or a Common year The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, commonly known as the United Kingdom, the UK or Britain,is a Sovereign state located The Liberal Party was one of the two major British political parties from the early 19th century until the rise of the Labour Party in the 1920s and a third party The United Kingdom general election of 1906 was held from 12 January to 8 February 1906 It has been argued that this legislation shows the emergence of the modern welfare state in the UK. This article refers specifically to the Welfare state of the United Kingdom. [2] They shifted their outlook from laissez-faire (self help) system to a more collectivist system. Laissez-faire ( pronunciation: French,; English,) is a French phrase literally meaning Let do (“allow to do” [3] The reforms demonstrate the shift of the Liberal Party from a party of small government and classical liberalism to a party of progressive liberalism and larger, more active government. Classical liberalism (also known as traditional liberalism, Laissez-faire liberalism, Market liberalism or in much of the world Social liberalism, also called new liberalism (as it was originally termed high liberalism radical liberalism, modern liberalism, or
The Liberal welfare reforms took place after a Royal Commission on how the countries Poor Law provision should be altered. The Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress 1905-09 was a body set up by the British Parliament in order to investigate how the Poor Law system should be changed This article deals chiefly with the English Poor Laws covering England and Wales Two contrasting reports known as the Majority report and the Minority Report were published, and as they differed so greatly the Liberals were able to ignore both reports and implement their own reforms. The majority report was a report published by the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws published in 1909 This article refers to a British Royal Commission report For other uses of the term Minority Report see here The Minority report was one of two reports published By implementing the reforms outside of the Poor Law the stigma attached to claiming relief was also removed. This article deals chiefly with the English Poor Laws covering England and Wales
During the 1906 General Election campaign none of the parties made poverty an election issue and no promises were made to introduce welfare reforms. The United Kingdom general election of 1906 was held from 12 January to 8 February 1906 Despite this the Liberals led by Henry Campbell-Bannerman won a landslide victory and began introducing wide ranging reforms as soon as they took office. Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, GCB (7 September 1836 &ndash 22 April 1908 was a British Liberal Statesman who served as Prime Minister [4]
The Conservative government in office before the Liberals came to power passed the Unemployed Workman's Act in 1903 and the Employment of Children Act in 1905. Slum housing was also cleared for new houses to be built. Much of this legislation was left for local authorities to implement - their attitudes affected whether legislation was fully implemented. [8] It was not until 1912 that medical treatment was available even though the medical inspections began in 1907. Education authorities largely ignored the provision of free medical treatment for school children. [9] The provision of free school meals was made compulsory in 1914- in which year fourteen million were served, most free. In 1912, half of all councils in Britain were offering the scheme. The government realised that they could not fight WW1 with a force of malnurished and ill children, when they had to conscript.
In 1908 pensions were introduced for the over 70s. This paid 5s a week (25p in today's money[10]) to single men and women and 7s 6d to married couples, on a sliding scale. The single persons rate applied to those over 70 earning under £21, this sum could be collected at the local post office. [11] The pensions were means-tested (to receive the pension one had to earn less than £31. 50 annually) and intentionally low to encourage workers to make their own provisions for the future. Not only this, but to qualify for the pension scheme, you had to have worked to your "full potential". There were no fixed guidelines as to what your "full potential" was, so people who had been briefly unemployed could be penalised. To be eligible you also would have had to live in the country for 20 years or more, so many immigrants could not claim their pensions, or British people who had worked abroad and returned to Britain to retire. [9] [12]
In 1909 labour exchanges were set up in order to help unemployed people find work, by providing centres where a large amount of employers and the unemployed could post jobs and apply for them respectively. In 1913 these labour exchanges were putting around 3000 people into a job each day. The National Insurance Act (Part I) passed in 1911 gave workers the right to sick pay of 10s a week and free medical treatment in return for a payment for 4d (the payments would last for 26 weeks if the person was off ill). The medical treatment was provided by doctors who belonged to a "panel" in each district. doctors received a fee from the insurance fund for each "panel" patient they treated. The National Insurance Act (Part II) gave workers the right to unemployment pay of 7s 6d a week for 15 weeks in return for a payment of 2½d a week.
Under Part 1 of the 1911 National Insurance Act compulsory health insurance was provided for workers earning less than £160 per year. The scheme was contributed to by the worker who contributed fourpence, the employer who contributed threepence and the government who contributed twopence. The scheme provided sickness benefit entitlement of nine shillings (45 pence), free medical treatment and maternity benefit of 30 shillings (£1. 50). [13]
Under Part 2 of the 1911 National Insurance Act which dealt with unemployment insurance most insured workers were given seven shillings (35 pence) unemployment benefit which could be claimed for up to 15 weeks a year. This scheme was also financed through the contributions of workers and government.
The Liberal reforms were funded by David Lloyd George passing his controversial People's Budget which heavily taxed the rich in order to pay for welfare solutions for the poor. David Lloyd George 1st Earl Lloyd George of Dwyfor OM, PC (17 January 1863 &ndash 26 March 1945 was a British Statesman and the only The 1909 (UK People's Budget was a product of Herbert Asquith 's Liberal government that introduced many unprecedented taxes on the wealthy and radical social welfare programmes The budget met opposition in the House of Lords and passed with a Parliament Act to limit the powers of the Lords over the Commons. The House of Lords is the second house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and is also commonly referred to as "the Lords" The crisis led to the Liberals losing their majority in the House of Commons and relying on the support of the small number of Labour and Irish nationalist MPs. The House of Commons' is the Lower house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which also comprises the Sovereign and the House of Lords
Lloyd George argued that his budget would eliminate poverty, while trying to get the Act passed he gave this speech outlining his reasons for supporting the reforms:
"This is a war Budget. It is for raising money to wage implacable warfare against poverty and squalidness. I cannot help hoping and believing that before this generation has passed away, we shall have advanced a great step towards that good time, when poverty, and the wretchedness and human degradation which always follows in its camp, will be as remote to the people of this country as the wolves which once infested its forests". [14]
After 1910 the Liberal Party did not have a majority in the House of Commons and so entered into a coalition with 42 Labour Party MPs who had been elected. This led to further reforms as the Liberals required Labour support and Irish support to remain in office. [15]
While the Liberal reforms were one of Britain's most ambitious welfare reform programmes, there were several limitations to the reforms they passed. Free school meals were not compulsory. Pensions were refused to those who had not been in work most of their life and life expectancy at this time was only 55 so many people never lived long enough to receive a pension. The labour exchange programme often managed to find people only part-time casual work. The poor had to pay National Insurance Contributions out of their wages and the 7s 6d was not enough to live on. Dole and sickness pay also only lasted for a limited time. Free medical care was available to only a wage-earner, not the wife or children or grandparents and other relatives. [16]
The Liberal reforms received criticism from those who saw this level of government intervention in people's lives as preventing self-help. Self-help or self-improvement refers to self-guided improvement—economically intellectually or emotionally—most frequently with a substantial psychological or spiritual The cost of the reforms was also criticised and there were also critics who suggested that the reforms would not work in practise. [17]
There were classical liberals who opposed this growing state intervention. Harold Cox, elected as a Liberal in 1906, was almost alone among Liberal MPs in opposing these reforms. Harold Cox (Tonbridge Kent 1859 - 1 May 1936) was a Liberal MP for Preston from 1906 to 1909 He considered them to be eroding freedom and undermining individual responsibility. He lost his seat to a Conservative in January 1910. [18] The Liberal journalist and editor of The Economist (1907-1916), F. W. Hirst, also opposed the reforms and the welfare state in general. The Economist is an English-language weekly news and International affairs publication owned by The Economist Newspaper Ltd and edited in London Francis Wrigley Hirst ( 10 June, 1873 - 22 February, 1953) was a British journalist writer and editor of The Economist [19]
Some workers objected to paying 4d per week to the National Insurance contributions. [20] The chant "Taffy was a Welshman, Taffy was a thief" was chanted at Lloyd George by workers and referred to the suggestion that Welshman Lloyd George was taking their wages away from them. [21] However, Lloyd George responded with his famous phrase "Nine pence for four pence" which referenced to that fact that employers and the government were topping up the workers' contributions. [22]
From 1911 MPs were given a salary of £400 per annum, meaning that it was much easier for working class people to stand for election. [23]
With the Beveridge Report and reforms of the Labour government under Clement Attlee creating what would be considered the modern welfare state protecting citizens from "cradle to grave" it can be argued that the Liberal reforms show the emergence of the welfare state some forty years earlier. The Beveridge Report was the Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Social Insurance and Allied Services chaired by William Beveridge, an economist Clement Richard Attlee 1st Earl Attlee, KG, OM, CH, PC ( 3 January 1883 &ndash 8 October 1967 This article refers specifically to the Welfare state of the United Kingdom. However, the Liberal reforms were not a preconceived welfare programme; it was more a response to political change (the newly enfranchised working classes and emerging Labour Party) and political factors such as the Boer War. The reforms were not collectivist in the sense that they relied on local government for implementation and still involved working with friendly societies. A friendly society (sometimes called a mutual society, benevolent society or fraternal organization) is a mutual association for insurance-like The implementation of these reforms by local government was patchy.
Only pensions were non-contributory, the health and insurance reforms required contributions. Rosemary Ree's argues in Poverty and Public Health 1815-1948 that the reforms also contained an element of Victorian moral attitudes in that the reforms did not cater to sections of society considered undeserving of help. The reforms signalled a fundamental shift in attitudes towards poverty and the poor and the redistribution of wealth through higher taxation which occurred in Lloyd George's People's Budget would be repeated in Labour's reforms between 1945-1951. The 1909 (UK People's Budget was a product of Herbert Asquith 's Liberal government that introduced many unprecedented taxes on the wealthy and radical social welfare programmes
Origins of the Liberal Welfare Reforms, 1906-14 (Studies in economic and social history) by James Roy Hay ISBN-13: 978-0333135884