A juvenile court or young offender court is a court of law having special authority to try and pass judgments for crimes committed by children or adolescents who have not attained the age of majority. In the sociological field, crime is the breach of a rule or Law for which some governing authority or force may ultimately prescribe a Punishment The age of majority is the threshold of Adulthood as it is conceptualized (and recognized or declared in Law. In most modern legal systems, crimes committed by children and minors are treated differently and differentially regarding the same crimes committed by adults. The three major legal systems of the world today consist of civil law, Common law and Religious law.
Severe, like murder or gang-related, offenses in 44 states of the USA are treated the same as crimes committed by adults: "Beginning around 35 years ago, increases in violent juvenile crime spurred many states to modify laws so that young people could be tried as adults for serious crimes. The United States of America —commonly referred to as the By 2004, 44 states and the District of Columbia permitted judges to transfer juveniles to adult-criminal courts. "MMIV" redirects here For the Modest Mouse album see " Baron von Bullshit Rides Again " Washington DC ( formally the District of Columbia and commonly referred to as Washington, the District, or simply D No national data exist on the number of juvenile offenders prosecuted as adults. "[1] "The main difference between a juvenile court and an adult court in England is that the juvenile court has a much wider jurisdiction in terms of the offenses it can try. It can deal with a juvenile for any offense except homicide, although it is not bound to deal with a young person for a serious offense such as robbery or rape; on such a charge he can be committed to the Crown Court for trial in the same manner as an adult. "[1]
Contents |
Juvenile courts exist because of a widespread belief that children are not always fully responsible for their actions, and that neither they nor society are best served by treating young children like adults.
The first juvenile court appeared in Chicago in 1899. It was founded on two principles: that juveniles were not ready to be held accountable for their actions, and was that they were not yet fully developed and could rehabilitate easier than adults. The idea was that the court should take over the discipline of troubled youth which would then establish a philosophy and a procedure. [2]
The juvenile courts categorize juveniles into three types: those who are charged with criminal conduct, those who have been neglected, and those who have been accused of a status offense or conduct such as truancy or disobedience with reasonable parenting. Therefore the juvenile courts were there to provide rehabilitation instead of punishment. The idea was to focus on their needs, providing treatment instead of depriving them of their liberty and protecting them against self-incrimination. [3]
Some programs offer education, job skills, counseling, drug treatment, and other programs for rehabilitation.
In all but three states, anyone charged with committing a criminal act before his or her eighteenth birthday is initially processed as a juvenile defendant. In New York, Connecticut and North Carolina, however, the minimum age at which all accused persons are charged as adults is 16, in other states such as Washington the minimum age depends on the seriousness of the crime. New York ( is a state in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern regions of the United States and is the nation's third most populous Connecticut ( is a state located in the New England region of the northeastern United States of America. North Carolina ( is a state located on the Atlantic Seaboard in the southeastern United States
The U. S. Supreme Court held in 1967, that children accused in a juvenile delinquency proceeding have the rights to due process, counsel, and against self-incrimination. Writing for the majority, Associate Justice Abe Fortas wrote, "Under our Constitution, the condition of being a boy does not justify a kangaroo court. Abraham Fortas ( June 19, 1910 – April 5, 1982) was a US Supreme Court associate justice. "[4]
There is no set age by which a child is accountable in the juvenile court system. Children below age seven are considered too young, and those above age fourteen are considered old enough to be held accountable in either juvenile or adult courts. [5] Not all minors who commit a crime end up in juvenile (or adult) court. A police officer has three choices:
In a juvenile court, it is possible to have formal charges being placed avoided. "Find Law" lists seven official factors that can help formal charges be avoided:[6]
Along with these seven, five "unofficial" factors can sway an official:
In his 1997 book No Matter How Loud I Shout, a study of the Los Angeles' Juvenile Courts, Edward Humes argued that the system is in need of a revolutionary reform. Edward Humes is a Pulitzer Prize -winning journalist and published non-fiction writer He stated that the system sends too many children with good chances of rehabilitation to adult court, while pushing aside and acquitting children early on the road in crime instead of giving counseling, support, and accountability. 57% of children arrested for the first time are never arrested again, 27% get arrested one or two more times, and 16% commit four or more crimes.