| Part of the series on |
 |
|
Schools of thought
Origins
Ideas
Topics
Related
|
Philosophy PortalFreedom of contract or contractualism is the idea that individuals should be free to bargain among themselves the terms of their own contracts, without government interference. Libertarianism is a term used by a broad spectrum of political philosophies which prioritize individual Liberty and seek to minimize or even abolish the Agorism is an anarchist Political philosophy founded by Samuel Edward Konkin III that holds the ultimate goal as bringing about a society in which Anarcho-capitalism (also known as Free-market anarchism) is an individualist anarchist Political philosophy that advocates the elimination Autarchism (from Greek, "belief in self rule" is a Political philosophy that upholds the principle of Individual liberty, rejects compulsory Christian libertarianism should not be confused with Libertarian Christianity. Geolibertarianism is a Political movement that strives to reconcile Libertarianism and Georgism (or geoism) Green libertarianism is a Political philosophy that has developed in the United States. Individualist anarchism refers to any of several traditions that hold that "individual conscience and the pursuit of self-interest should not be constrained by any collective Left-libertarianism (or left-wing libertarianism) is a term that has been adopted by several different libertarian political movements and theorists Libertarian socialism is a group of political philosophies that aim to create a society without political economic or social hierarchies – a society in which all violent Individualist feminism (sometimes also grouped with libertarian feminism or ifeminism) is a term for feminist ideas which seek to celebrate Free-market anarchism (sometimes called market anarchism) refers to an Individualist anarchist Philosophy that harmonizes the abolition of the state with Market socialism is a term used to denote two different Economic system (s based in Socialism which operate according to Market principles In Civics, minarchism, sometimes called minimal Statism, small government, or limited-government Libertarianism Mutualism, is an Anarchist school of thought, can be traced to the writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon that envisioned a society where each person might possess a Neolibertarianism is a political philosophy combining elements of Libertarian and Neoconservative thought that embraces Incrementalism domestically Paleolibertarianism is a school of thought within American Libertarianism founded by Lew Rockwell and Murray Rothbard, and closely associated Right-libertarianism or right libertarianism is a phrase used to either describe non- Collectivist forms of Libertarianism or a variety of different libertarian Voluntaryism is a Philosophy that opposes anything that it sees as unjustifiably invasive and Coercive. Objectivism is a Philosophy developed by Ayn Rand in the 20th century that encompasses positions on Metaphysics, Epistemology, The Austrian School, also known as the “ Vienna School ” or the “ Psychological School ” is a heterodox school of economics that advocates Classical liberalism (also known as traditional liberalism, Laissez-faire liberalism, Market liberalism or in much of the world Individualist anarchism refers to any of several traditions that hold that "individual conscience and the pursuit of self-interest should not be constrained by any collective thumb| |Broken Liberty Istanbul Archaeology Museum Civil liberties are freedoms that protect the Individual from the Government. Counter-economics is a term originally coined by Samuel Edward Konkin III, a radical Libertarian activist and theorist who defined it as " the study and/or Decriminalization is the reduction or abolition of criminal penalties in relation to certain acts but regulated permits or fines might still apply (for contrast Economic freedom is freedom to produce trade and consume any goods and services acquired without the use of force fraud or theft A free market is a Market in which property rights are voluntarily exchanged at a price arranged completely by the mutual consent of sellers and buyers Free trade is a system in which the trade of goods and services between or within countries flows unhindered by government-imposed restrictions The question of free will The homestead principle (or original appropriation) is part of libertarian and anarcho-capitalist Ethics. Humanism is a broad category of ethical philosophies that affirm the dignity and worth of all people based on the ability to determine right and wrong by appealing to universal Methodological individualism is a philosophical method aimed at explaining and understanding broad society-wide developments as the aggregation of decisions by individuals Laissez-faire ( pronunciation: French,; English,) is a French phrase literally meaning Let do (“allow to do” Liberty, the freedom to act or believe without being stopped by unnecessary force A night watchman state, or a minimal state, is a Form of government in Political philosophy where the government's responsibilities are so minimal they The non-aggression principle (also called the non-aggression axiom, anticoercion principle, or zero aggression principle) is a Deontological Nonintervention or non-interventionism is a foreign policy which holds that political rulers should avoid alliances with other nations and avoid all wars not related to direct Property is any physical or virtual entity that is owned by an individual Self-governance is an abstract concept that refers to several scales of Organization. Self-ownership (or sovereignty of the individual, individual sovereignty or individual autonomy) is the moral or natural right (aka Freedom of a person The subjective theory of value (or theory of subjective value) is an economic theory of value that holds that "to possess value an object must be both useful A tax resister resists or refuses payment of a Tax because of opposition to the institution collecting the tax or to some of that institution’s policies The libertarian movement consists of the various individuals and institutions who expound or promote the ideas and causes of Libertarianism. Libertarianism is a Political philosophy that emphasises the Liberty of the individual and seeks to minimize or even abolish the State. Many countries and subnational political entities have libertarian political parties. Libertarian theories of law build upon classical liberal and individualist anarchist doctrines Adherents of different ideologies have criticized Libertarianism for various reasons Civil libertarianism is a strain of political thought that supports Civil liberties, or who emphasizes the supremacy of Individual rights and Personal freedoms For the revolt in Brazil, see Constitutionalist Revolution. The term Constitutionalism is a word with a variety of meanings A libertarian Democrat is a person who subscribes to libertarian philosophy while typically voting for and being involved with the United States Democratic Party. A libertarian Republican (LR is a person who subscribes to libertarian philosophy while typically voting for and being involved with the United States Republican Party Libertarian transhumanism is a Political philosophy synthesizing Libertarianism and Transhumanism. Anything more than minimal regulations and taxes may be seen as infringements. It is the underpinning of the theory of laissez-faire economics. Laissez-faire ( pronunciation: French,; English,) is a French phrase literally meaning Let do (“allow to do” Economists justify it as a benefit to society by increasing choice and decreasing unemployment caused by regulations such as the minimum wage. Unemployment occurs when a person is available to work and currently seeking work but the person is without work. [1]
The philosophy put forward by theorists Adam Smith and Thomas Hobbes is for an individual to use society as a tool for acquiring property. Adam Smith ( baptised 16 June 1723 – 17 July 1790) was a Scottish moral philosopher and a pioneer of Political economy. Thomas Hobbes (born 5 April 1588died 4 December 1679 was an English philosopher, whose famous 1651 book Leviathan established the foundation They saw the state as simply a means to an end, not as a provider. They opposed artificial restraint on the free-will of the individual to pursue his own self interests. Hobbes would have called it liberal natural law. Natural law or the law of nature ( Latin: lex naturalis) is a theory that posits the existence of a law whose content is set by Nature and that
Contents |
History
Freedom of Contract as we know it today stemmed from the Enlightenment ideals of John Locke. The Age of Enlightenment or The Enlightenment is a term used to describe a phase in Western philosophy and cultural life centered upon the eighteenth century John Locke (29 August 1632 – 28 October 1704 was an English Philosopher. Locke's Two Treatises of Government argued against the divine right of kings as the supreme authority. The Two Treatises of Government (or " Two Treatises of Government In the Former The False Principles and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer And His Followers are Detected Society, Locke reasoned, functioned best when freely determined social contracts governed human behavior. This was the only way to preserve life, liberty, and property. He called these "natural" rights.
Henry James Sumner Maine expanded the idea when he proposed that social structures evolve from roles derived from status to those based on contractual freedom. Sir Henry James Sumner Maine, KCSI ( August 15, 1822 - February 3, 1888) was an English comparative jurist and In Sociology or Anthropology, social status is the honor or prestige attached to one's position in Society (one's Social position) A status system establishes obligations and relationships by birth whereas a contract presumes that the individuals are free and equal. Modern Libertarianism such as that advanced by Robert Nozick sees freedom of contract as the expression of the independent decisions of separate individuals pursuing their own interests in a "minimal state. Libertarianism is a term used by a broad spectrum of political philosophies which prioritize individual Liberty and seek to minimize or even abolish the Robert Nozick ( November 16, 1938 &ndash January 23, 2002) was an American Philosopher and Pellegrino University "
Liberty of contract in America
In the United States, fundamental rights have special significance under the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution. The United States of America —commonly referred to as the Amendment IX (the Ninth Amendment) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, addresses rights of the people that are The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme Law of the United States. The framers of the constitution intended for it to be a catch-all amendment to make it clear that rights and liberties were not exclusive or limited to the bill of rights. In the United States the Bill of Rights is the name by which the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution are known The 9th Amendment says:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Article I, Section 10 also protects the freedom of contract:
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
The theory was a fundamental part of American legal doctrine until the New Deal revolution of the 1930's when it fell out of favor. The New Deal was the name that United States President Franklin D Year 1930 ( MCMXXX) was a Common year starting on Wednesday (link will display 1930 calendar of the Gregorian calendar. Liberty of Contract was portrayed in the press as being "pro-business" and "anti-labor". After the Supreme Court used it to strike down several pieces of New Deal legislation, President Roosevelt tried to pack the court to alter their decisions. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest judicial body in the United States and leads the federal judiciary. The New Deal was the name that United States President Franklin D
Lochner v. New York
In 1902 a New York baker named Joseph Lochner was fined for violating a state law limiting the number of hours his employees could work. Lochner v New York, 198 US 45 (1905 was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that held the " Right to free contract " was Year 1905 ( MCMV) was a Common year starting on Sunday (link will display full calendar of the Gregorian calendar (or a Common year starting Year 1902 ( MCMII) was a Common year starting on Wednesday (link will display calendar of the Gregorian calendar (or a Common year starting New York ( is a state in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern regions of the United States and is the nation's third most populous He sued the state on the grounds that he was denied his right to "due process". Lochner claimed that he had the right to freely contract with his employees and that the state had unfairly interfered with that right.
In 1905 the Supreme Court used the "due process" clause in the 14th Amendment to declare unconstitutional the New York state statute imposing a limit on hours of work. Year 1905 ( MCMV) was a Common year starting on Sunday (link will display full calendar of the Gregorian calendar (or a Common year starting The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest judicial body in the United States and leads the federal judiciary. Due process (more fully due process of law) is the principle that a person has a right to receive notice and be heard in an orderly proceeding in order to protect his or her New York ( is a state in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern regions of the United States and is the nation's third most populous In Lochner v. New York, Justice Peckham wrote for the majority: "Under that provision no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Lochner v New York, 198 US 45 (1905 was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that held the " Right to free contract " was This article is about the Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court for Justice Peckham's father of the same name who served in the U The right to purchase or to sell labor is part of the liberty protected by this amendment. . . "
Writing in dissent, Oliver Wendell Holmes accused the majority of basing its decision on laissez-faire ideology. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr ( March 8, 1841 &ndash March 6, 1935) was an American Jurist who served on the Supreme Laissez-faire ( pronunciation: French,; English,) is a French phrase literally meaning Let do (“allow to do” He believed that they were making law based on economics rather than interpreting the constitution. Economics is the social science that studies the production distribution, and consumption of goods and services. Neither did he believe that "Liberty of Contract" existed or was intended in the constitution.
In his "Liberty of Contract" (1909), Roscoe Pound persuasively critiqued freedom of contract laws by laying out case after case where labor rights were struck down by State and Federal Supreme Courts. Pound argued the courts' rulings were "simply wrong" from the standpoint of common law and "even from that of a sane individualism" (482). Pound further compared the situation of labor legislation in his time to common opinion of usury and that the two were "of the same type" (484). Pound lamented that the legacy of such "academic" and "artificial" judicial rulings for liberty of contract engendered a "lost respect for the courts", but predicted a "bright" future for labor legislation (486-87). [1]
By 1937 politics forced the court to reverse its view in the case West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish. Year 1937 ( MCMXXXVII) was a Common year starting on Friday (link will display the full calendar of the Gregorian calendar. West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, 300 US 379 (1937 was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the constitutionality of In that case the court upheld a Washington state law setting a minimum wage. Washington ( is a state in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. A minimum wage is the lowest hourly daily or monthly Wage that employers may legally pay to employees or workers
Tyranny of the majority
Many see morality as the basis for requiring an individual to keep his promise. Most cultures value honour and honesty, and rely on conscience to underpin morality. Honor or Honour (see spelling differences) (the latter directly from the Latin word honos honoris) is the evaluation of a person's Honesty is the human quality of communicating and acting Truthfully related to Truth as a value Conscience is a hypothesized Ability or faculty that distinguishes whether our actions are right or wrong Dishonesty is generally considered wrong, particularly when one promise induces another person to take action. Equity or similar codes of fairness therefore require a person to obey the dictates of his or her conscience and so avoid causing loss to other people. Equity is the name given to the set of legal principles in jurisdictions following the English common law tradition which supplement strict rules of law where Therefore, they codify the concept of wrong in tort — the law of private wrongs — which is based on the notions of personal accountability, causation, and, in modern law, negligence. Tort law is the name given to a body of law that creates and provides remedies for civil wrongs that do not arise out of Contractual duties Causation is the "causal relationship between conduct and result Negligence (Lat negligentia from negligere to neglect literally "not to pick up" is a legal concept in the Common law legal systems usually used to
Both John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville described what they called the "Tyranny of the majority". John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806 &ndash 8 May 1873 British Philosopher, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament, was an influential The phrase tyranny of the majority, used in discussing systems of Democracy and Majority rule, is a criticism of the Scenario in which decisions made Both men were concerned with minority interests being subject to whim of the majority. They even went so far as to imply that the minority would be victims of tyranny by ochlocracy. In modern usage a tyrant is a single ruler holding absolute power over a State or within an Organization. Ochlocracy ( Greek: οχλοκρατία or okhlokratía; Latin: ochlocratia) is government by mob or a mass of people This is why modern constitutions contain bills of rights that limit the powers of the legislature. A Bill of Rights is a list or summary of rights that are considered important and essential by a group of people
Exclusion clauses
In George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd, Lord Denning MR compared "freedom of contract" with oppression of the weak. George Mitchell (Chesterhall Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd QB 284 is a case on the Sale of goods and exclusion clauses Alfred Thompson 'Tom' Denning Baron Denning, OM, PC ( 23 January, 1899 &ndash 5 March, 1999) was an English
The heyday of freedom of contract
None of you nowadays will remember the trouble we had - when I was called to the Bar - with exemption clauses. They were printed in small print on the back of tickets and order forms and invoices. They were contained in catalogues or timetables. They were held to be binding on *297 any person who took them without objection. No one ever did object. He never read them or knew what was in them. No matter how unreasonable they were, he was bound. All this was done in the name of "freedom of contract. " But the freedom was all on the side of the big concern which had the use of the printing press. No freedom for the little man who took the ticket or order form or invoice. The big concern said, "Take it or leave it. " The little man had no option but to take it. The big concern could and did exempt itself from liability in its own interest without regard to the little man. It got away with it time after time. When the courts said to the big concern, "You must put it in clear words," the big concern had no hesitation in doing so. It knew well that the little man would never read the exemption clauses or understand them. It was a bleak winter for our law of contract. It is illustrated by two cases, Thompson v. London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co. [1930] 1 K. B. 41 (in which there was exemption from liability, not on the ticket, but only in small print at the back of the timetable, and the company were held not liable) and L'Estrange v. F. Graucob Ltd. [1934] 2 K. B. 394 (in which there was complete exemption in small print at the bottom of the order form, and the company were held not liable).
The secret weapon
Faced with this abuse of power - by the strong against the weak - by the use of the small print of the conditions - the judges did what they could to put a curb upon it. They still had before them the idol, "freedom of contract. " They still knelt down and worshipped it, but they concealed under their cloaks a secret weapon. They used it to stab the idol in the back. This weapon was called "the true construction of the contract. " They used it with great skill and ingenuity. They used it so as to depart from the natural meaning of the words of the exemption clause and to put upon them a strained and unnatural construction. In case after case, they said that the words were not strong enough to give the big concern exemption from liability; or that in the circumstances the big concern was not entitled to rely on the exemption clause. If a ship deviated from the contractual voyage, the owner could not rely on the exemption clause. If a warehouseman stored the goods in the wrong warehouse, he could not pray in aid the limitation clause. If the seller supplied goods different in kind from those contracted for, he could not rely on any exemption from liability. If a shipowner delivered goods to a person without production of the bill of lading, he could not escape responsibility by reference to an exemption clause. In short, whenever the wide words - in their natural meaning - would give rise to an unreasonable result, the judges either rejected them as repugnant to the main purpose of the contract, or else cut them down to size in order to produce a reasonable result. This is illustrated by these cases in the House of Lords: Glynn v. Margetson & Co. [1893] A. C. 351 ; London and North Western Railway Co. v. Neilson [1922] 2 A. C. 263 ; Cunard Steamship Co. Ltd. v. Buerger [1927] A. C. 1 ; and by Canada Steamship Lines Ltd. v. The King [1952] A. C. 192 and Sze Hai Tong Bank Ltd. v. Rambler Cycle Co. Ltd. [1959] A. C. 576 in the Privy Council; and innumerable cases in the Court of Appeal, culminating in *298 Levison v. Patent Steam Carpet Cleaning Co. Ltd. [1978] Q. B. 69 . But when the clause was itself reasonable and gave rise to a reasonable result, the judges upheld it; at any rate, when the clause did not exclude liability entirely but only limited it to a reasonable amount. So where goods were deposited in a cloakroom or sent to a laundry for cleaning, it was quite reasonable for the company to limit their liability to a reasonable amount, having regard to the small charge made for the service. These are illustrated by Gibaud v. Great Eastern Railway Co. [1921] 2 K. B. 426 ; Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd. [1945] K. B. 189 and Gillespie Bros. & Co. Ltd. v Roy Bowles Transport Ltd. [1973] Q. B. 400.
Literature
- Trebilcock, Michael J. :"The Limits of Freedom of Contract" (Harvard University Press) ISBN 13 978-0-674-53429-2
- Atiyah, P. S:"The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract" (Oxford University Press, USA; New ed; Dec 12, 1985) ISBN 13 978-0198255277
References
- ^ Roscoe Pound, "Liberty of Contract," 18 Yale Law Journal 454 (1909).
Dictionary
freedom of contract
-noun
- The idea that individuals should be free to bargain among themselves the terms of their own contracts, without government interference.
Dapyx Software network: MP3 Explorer | Ebook Manager | Zenithic