In philosophy, a formal fallacy or a logical fallacy is a pattern of reasoning which is always wrong. This article is about Philosophical logic not Philosophy of logic Philosophical logic is the study of the more specifically philosophical aspects of This is due to a flaw in the structure of the argument which renders the argument invalid. In Logic, an argument is a Set of one or more Declarative sentences (or "propositions") known as the Premises along The term validity (also called logical truth, analytic truth, or necessary truth) as it occurs in Logic refers generally to a property of A formal fallacy is contrasted with an informal fallacy, which may have a valid logical form, but be false due to the characteristics of its premises, or its justification structure. An Informal fallacy is an argument whose stated premises fail to support their proposed conclusion In Discourse and Logic, a premise is a claim that is a reason (or element of a set of reasons for or objection against some other claim
The term fallacy is often used more generally to mean an argument which is problematic for any reason, whether it be a formal or an informal fallacy. A fallacy is a component of an Argument which being demonstrably flawed in its Logic or form renders the argument invalid in whole
The presence of a formal fallacy in a deductive argument does not imply anything about the argument's premises or its conclusion. Both may actually be true, or even more probable as a result of the argument (e. g. appeal to authority), but the deductive argument is still invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises in the manner described. An appeal to authority or argument by authority is a type of argument in Logic called a fallacy By extension, an argument can contain a formal fallacy even if the argument is not a deductive one; for instance an inductive argument that incorrectly applies principles of probability or causality can be said to commit a formal fallacy. Probability is the likelihood or chance that something is the case or will happen Causality (but not causation) denotes a necessary relationship between one event (called cause and another event (called effect) which is the direct consequence
Recognizing fallacies in everyday arguments may be difficult since arguments are often embedded in rhetorical patterns that obscure the logical connections between statements. Rhetoric has had many definitions no simple definition can do it justice Informal fallacies may also exploit the emotions or intellectual or psychological weaknesses of the audience. An emotion is a mental and physiological state associated with a wide variety of feelings thoughts and behaviours Psychology (from Greek grc ψῡχή psȳkhē, "breath life soul" and grc -λογία -logia) is an Academic and Having the capability to recognize fallacies in arguments is one way to reduce the likelihood of such occurrences.
A different approach to understanding and classifying fallacies is provided by argumentation theory. Argumentation theory, or argumentation, embraces the arts and sciences of civil debate Dialogue, conversation and persuasion studying rules of Inference In this approach, an argument is regarded as an interactive protocol between individuals which attempts to resolve their disagreements. In International politics, protocol is the Etiquette of Diplomacy and affairs of state The protocol is regulated by certain rules of interaction and violations of these rules are fallacies. Many of the fallacies in the list below are best understood as being fallacies in this sense.
Such fallacies are used in many forms of modern communications where the intention is to influence behavior and change beliefs - examples in the mass media today include but are not limited to propaganda, advertisements, politics, newspaper editorials and opinion-based news shows. "Popular press" redirects here note that the University of Wisconsin Press publishes under the imprint "The Popular Press" Propaganda is a concerted set of messages aimed at influencing the opinions or behaviors of large numbers of people Advertising is a form of Communication that typically attempts to persuade potential Customers to Purchase or to consume more of a particular Brand Politics Politics is the process by which groups of people make decisions
Common examples
-
For a list of types of formal and informal fallacy, as well as examples of fallacious arguments, see Fallacy. This is a list of logical fallacies. Formal fallacies Formal fallacies are arguments that are fallacious due to an error in their form or technical A fallacy is a component of an Argument which being demonstrably flawed in its Logic or form renders the argument invalid in whole For a concise list of "appeal to" fallacies, see Appeal (disambiguation).
See also
References
- Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, De Sophistici Elenchi. The expression anecdotal evidence has two quite distinct meanings An argumentum ad populum ( Latin: "appeal to the people" in Logic, is a fallacious argument that concludes a Proposition to be true An argument is cogent if and only if the truth of the argument's premises would render the truth of the conclusion probable (i For an article about the conceptual problems of the mind see Cognitive closure (philosophy. The conjunction fallacy is a Logical fallacy that occurs when it is assumed that specific conditions are more probable than a single general one Demagogy (also demagoguery) ( Ancient Greek δημαγωγία from dēmos "people" and agein "to lead" refers to a political A fallacy is a component of an Argument which being demonstrably flawed in its Logic or form renders the argument invalid in whole Fallacies of definition refer to the various ways in which Definitions can fail to have merit A false statement is a statement that can be either willfully or unknowingly untrue Informal logic (or occasionally non-formal logic) is the study of arguments as presented in ordinary language as contrasted with the presentations of arguments in In Mathematics, there are a variety of spurious proofs of obvious Contradictions Although the proofs are flawed the errors usually by design are comparatively subtle A paradox is a true statement or group of statements that leads to a Contradiction or a situation which defies intuition; or inversely In Mathematical logic, a Logical system has the soundness property If and only if its Inference rules prove only formulas that are In Statistics, a spurious relationship (or sometimes spurious correlation) is a Mathematical relationship in which two occurrences have no causal connection The term validity (also called logical truth, analytic truth, or necessary truth) as it occurs in Logic refers generally to a property of A vacuous truth is a truth that is devoid of content because it asserts something about all members of a class that is empty or because it says "If  A  then  Aristotle (Greek Aristotélēs) (384 BC – 322 BC was a Greek philosopher a student of Plato and teacher of Alexander the Great.
- William of Ockham, Summa of Logic (ca. William of Ockham (also Occam, Hockham, or any of several other spellings ˈɒkəm (c 1323) Part III. 4.
- John Buridan, Summulae de dialectica Book VII.
- Francis Bacon, the doctrine of the idols in Novum Organum Scientiarum, Aphorisms concerning The Interpretation of Nature and the Kingdom of Man, XXIIIff.
- The Art of Controversy | Die Kunst, Recht zu behalten — The Art Of Controversy (bilingual), by Arthur Schopenhauer
- John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic — Raciocinative and Inductive. Book 5, Chapter 7, Fallacies of Confusion.
- C. L. Hamblin, Fallacies. Methuen London, 1970. Year 1970 ( MCMLXX) was a Common year starting on Thursday (link shows full calendar of the Gregorian calendar.
- Fearnside, W. Ward and William B. Holther, Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument, 1959.
- Vincent F. Hendricks, Thought 2 Talk: A Crash Course in Reflection and Expression, New York: Automatic Press / VIP, 2005, ISBN 87-991013-7-8
- D. Vincent F Hendricks ( March 6, 1970) is a distinguished philosopher and logician H. Fischer, Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought, Harper Torchbooks, 1970.
- Douglas N. Walton, Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press, 1989. Year 1989 ( MCMLXXXIX) was a Common year starting on Sunday (link displays 1989 Gregorian calendar)
- F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1992. Year 1992 ( MCMXCII) was a Leap year starting on Wednesday (link will display full 1992 Gregorian calendar)
- Warburton Nigel, Thinking from A to Z, Routledge 1998. Year 1998 ( MCMXCVIII) was a Common year starting on Thursday (link will display full 1998 Gregorian calendar)
- T. Edward Damer. Attacking Faulty Reasoning, 5th Edition, Wadsworth, 2005. Attacking Faulty Reasoning is a textbook on Logical fallacies by T ISBN 0-534-60516-8
- Sagan, Carl, "The Demon-Haunted World: Science As a Candle in the Dark". Carl Edward Sagan ( November 9 1934 &ndash December 20 1996) was an American Astronomer, astrochemist, author The Demon-Haunted World Science as a Candle in the Dark is a book by astrophysicist Carl Sagan and his wife Ann Druyan, which was first published Ballantine Books, March 1997 ISBN 0-345-40946-9, 480 pgs. The Ballantine Publishing Group, better known as Ballantine Books, is a major American book Publisher founded in 1952 by Ian Ballantine. 1996 hardback edition: Random House, ISBN 0-394-53512-X, xv+457 pages plus addenda insert (some printings). Random House Inc is the world's largest English-language general trade book publisher
External links
Dictionary
formal fallacy
-noun
- (logic) A pattern of reasoning which is always wrong, due to a flaw in the structure of the argument.
© 2009 citizendia.org; parts available under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License, from http://en.wikipedia.org
network: | |