| Country | Type | Energy balance |
|---|---|---|
| Corn ethanol | 1. The United States of America —commonly referred to as the 3 | |
| Sugarcane ethanol | 8 | |
| Biodiesel | 2. |utc_offset = -2 to -4 |time_zone_DST = BRST |utc_offset_DST = -2 to -5 |cctld Germany, officially the Federal Republic of Germany ( ˈbʊndəsʁepuˌbliːk ˈdɔʏtʃlant is a Country in Central Europe. 5 | |
| Cellulosic ethanol | †2–36 |
† depending on production method
All biomass needs to go through some of these steps: it needs to be grown, collected, dried, fermented, and burned. The United States of America —commonly referred to as the Biomass refers to living and recently dead Biological material that can be used as fuel or for industrial production All of these steps require resources and an infrastructure. The total amount of energy input into the process compared to the energy released by burning the resulting ethanol fuel is known as the ethanol fuel energy balance and studied as part of the wider field of energy economics. Ethanol fuel is Ethanol (ethyl alcohol the same type of Alcohol found in Alcoholic beverages. Energy economics is a broad scientific subject area which includes topics related to supply and use of Energy in societies. Figures compiled in a 2007 National Geographic Magazine article [1] point to modest results for corn ethanol produced in the US: 1 unit of current energy equals 1. The National Geographic Magazine is the official journal of the National Geographic Society. 3 energy units of corn ethanol energy. The energy balance for sugarcane ethanol produced in Brazil is more favorable, 1:8. Over the years, however, many reports have been produced with contradicting energy balance estimates.
Contents |
In 1995 the USDA released a report stating that the net energy balance of corn ethanol in the United States was an average of 1. 24. It was previously considered to have a negative net energy balance. However, due to increases in corn crop yield and more efficient farming practices corn ethanol had gained energy efficiency [2]
Opponents of corn ethanol production in the U. S. often quote the 2005 paper [3] of David Pimentel, a retired Entomologist, and Tadeusz Patzek, a Geological Engineer from UC Berkeley. Both have been exceptionally critical of ethanol and other biofuels. Their studies contend that ethanol, and biofuels in general, are "energy negative", meaning they take more energy to produce than is contained in the final product.
A 2006 article [4] in Science offers the consensus opinion that current corn ethanol technologies had similar greenhouse gas emissions to gasoline, but was much less petroleum-intensive than gasoline. Science is the Academic journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and is considered one of the world's most prestigious Scientific Furthermore, it should be pointed out that fossil fuels also require significant energy inputs which have seldom been accounted for in the past.
It is also important to note that ethanol is not the only product created during production, and the energy content of the by-products must also be considered. Corn is typically 66% starch and the remaining 33% is not fermented. This unfermented component is called distillers grain, which is high in fats and proteins, and makes good animal feed. [5]
Back in 2000, Dr. Michael Wang, of Argonne National Laboratory, wrote that these ethanol by-products are the most contentious issue in evaluating the energy balance of ethanol. Argonne National Laboratory is one of the United States Department of Energy 's oldest and largest science and engineering research national laboratories and is He wrote that Pimentel assumes that corn ethanol entirely replaces gasoline and so the quantity of by-products is too large for the market to absorb, and they become waste. At lower quantities of production, Wang finds it appropriate to credit corn ethanol based on the input energy requirement of the feed product or good that the ethanol by-product displaces. [6] In 2004, a USDA report found that co-products accounting made the difference between energy ratios of 1. 06 and 1. 67[7]. In 2006, MIT researcher Tiffany Groode came to similar conclusions about the co-product issue. [8]
In Brazil where sugar cane is used, the yield is higher, and conversion to ethanol is somewhat more energy efficient than corn. Recent developments with cellulosic ethanol production may improve yields even further. Cellulosic ethanol also know by the name Ceetol, is a Biofuel produced from wood grasses or the non-edible parts of plants [9]
In 2006 a study from the University of Minnesota found that corn-grain ethanol produced 1. The University of Minnesota Twin Cities ( U of M or The U) is the oldest and largest part of the University of Minnesota system. 25 units of energy per unit put in. [10]
A 2008 study by the University of Nebraska found a 5. The University of Nebraska is the public University system in the state of Nebraska, USA. 4 energy balance for ethanol derived specifically from switchgrass [11] [12]. Panicum virgatum, commonly known as switchgrass, is a warm season Grass and is one of the dominant Species of the central North American This estimate is better than in previous studies and according to the authors partly due to the larger size of the field trial (3-9 ha) on 10 farms. Explanation The hectare is commonly used in most countries around the world especially in domains concerned with land planning and management such as Agriculture,
According to DoE, [13] to evaluate the net energy of ethanol four variables must be considered:
Much of the current academic discussion regarding ethanol currently revolves around issues of system borders. This refers to how complete of a picture is drawn for energy inputs. There is debate on whether to include items like the energy required to feed the people tending and processing the corn, to erect and repair farm fences, even the amount of energy a tractor represents.
In addition, there is no consensus on what sort of value to give the rest of the corn (such as the stalk), commonly known as the 'coproduct. ' Some studies leave it on the field to protect the soil from erosion and to add organic matter, while others take and burn the coproduct to power the ethanol plant, but do not address the resulting soil erosion (which would require energy in the form of fertilizer to replace). Depending on the ethanol study you read, net energy returns vary from . 7-1. 5 units of ethanol per unit of fossil fuel energy consumed. For comparison, that same one unit of fossil fuel invested in oil and gas extraction (in the lower 48 States) will yield 15 units of gasoline, a yield an order of magnitude better than current ethanol production technologies, ignoring the energy quality arguments above and the fact that the gain (14 units) is not carbon neutral. [14]
In this regard, geography is the decisive factor. Geography (from Greek γεωγραφία - geografia) is the study of the Earth and its lands features inhabitants and phenomena In tropical regions with abundant water and land resources, such as Brazil and Colombia, the viability of production of ethanol from sugarcane is no longer in question; in fact, the burning of sugarcane residues (bagasse) generates far more energy than needed to operate the ethanol plants, and many of them are now selling electric energy to the utilities. |utc_offset = -2 to -4 |time_zone_DST = BRST |utc_offset_DST = -2 to -5 |cctld Colombia (kəˈlʌmbɪə officially the Republic of Colombia () is a country in northwestern South America. Sugarcane ( Saccharum) is a genus of 6 to 37 species (depending on taxonomic interpretation of tall perennial grasses (family Poaceae tribe Andropogoneae Bagasse (sometimes spelled bagass) is the Biomass remaining after Sugarcane or Sorghum stalks are crushed to extract their juice and is However, while there may be a positive net energy return at the moment, recent research suggests that the sugarcane plantations are not sustainable in the long run, as they are depleting the soil of nutrients and carbon matter
The picture is different for other regions, such as most of the United States, where the climate is too cool for sugarcane. The United States of America —commonly referred to as the In the U. S. , agricultural ethanol is generally obtained from grain, chiefly corn. Maize (ˈmeɪz ( Zea mays L. ssp mays) known as corn in some countries is a cereal grain domesticated in Mesoamerica But it can also be obtained from cellulose, more energy balanced bioethanol. Cellulosic ethanol also know by the name Ceetol, is a Biofuel produced from wood grasses or the non-edible parts of plants
Clean production bioethanol is a biofuel obtained using as much as possible non-greenhouse gas renewable energy sources:
To transport the biofuel to the fuel-stations can be used truck with ethanol engines or electric motors (that uses energy solar energy stored in the batteries).