Conversation analysis (commonly abbreviated as CA) is the study of talk in interaction. CA generally attempts to describe the orderliness, structure and sequential patterns of interaction, whether this is institutional (in the school, doctor's surgery, courts or elsewhere) or casual conversation. Thus, use of the term “conversation” to label this disciplinary movement is misleading if read in a colloquial sense, as many have. In light of this, one of CA’s principal practitioners, Emanuel Schegloff, has more recently identified “talk-in-interaction” as CA’s topic. Perhaps for this same reason, others (e. g. , Jonathan Potter) who use CA methods identify themselves as discourse analysts (DA), though that term was first used to identify researchers using methods different from CA (e. Jonathan Potter is currently Professor of Discourse Analysis at Loughborough University and one of the originators of Discursive psychology. Discourse analysis (DA or discourse studies, is a general term for a number of approaches to analyzing written spoken or signed language use g. , Levinson, 1983), and still identifies a group of scholars larger than those who use only CA methods.
Inspired by ethnomethodology, it was developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s principally by the sociologist Harvey Sacks and, among others, his close associates Emanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. What is ethnomethodology Ethnomethodology is a sociological discipline which studies the ways in which people make sense of their world display this understanding Harvey Sacks ( 1935 -November 1975) was an American Sociologist influenced by the Ethnomethodology tradition Emanuel Schegloff is Distinguished Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Los Angeles. Gail Jefferson ( 22 April 1938 – 21 February 2008) was the creator of many of the elements of Conversation Analysis transcription Sacks died early in his career, but his work was championed by others in his field, and CA has now become an established force in sociology, anthropology, linguistics, speech-communication and psychology. It is particularly influential in interactional sociolinguistics, discourse analysis and discursive psychology, as well as being a coherent discipline in its own right. Sociolinguistics is the study of the effect of any and all aspects of Society, including cultural norms expectations and context on the way Language is used Discourse analysis (DA or discourse studies, is a general term for a number of approaches to analyzing written spoken or signed language use For other uses of the word see discursive Discursive psychology is a form of Discourse analysis that focuses on psychological themes Recently CA techniques of sequential analysis have been employed by phoneticians to explore the fine phonetic detail of speech (Kelly and Local 1989). In Statistics, sequential analysis or sequential hypothesis testing is Statistical analysis where the Sample size is not fixed in advance Phonetics (from the Greek φωνή ( phonê) "sound" or "voice" is the study of the physical sounds of human speech [1]
Contents |
The set of practices by which a conversation is done in and through turns. Turn-taking is one of the fundamental organizations of conversation. According to CA, the turn-taking system consists of two components: the turn constructional component and the turn allocational component. The turn-taking organization is described in Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. A. , & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
While CA does not explicitly claim that turn-taking is universal, as research is conducted on more languages, it is possible that if there were any basis for a claim to universality in language, turn-taking is a good candidate. The turn-taking model for conversation was arrived at inductively through empirical investigation of field recordings of conversation and fitted to such observationally arrived at fact as overwhelmingly, participants in conversation talk one at a time, while managing to minimize gaps between turns at talk, and overlapping turns.
The turn constructional component describes basic units out of which turns are fashioned. These basic units are known as turn constructional units or TCUs. Unit types include: lexical, clausal, phrasal, and sentential. These are grammatically and pragmatically complete units, meaning that in a particular context they accomplish recognizable social actions.
Note that not all unit types may exist in all languages. Further, it is possible that there are units in other languages, such as particles in Asian languages, that may not exist in English.
The turn allocational component describes how turns are allocated among participants in a conversation. The three ordered options are: Current Speaker selects Next Speaker; Next Speaker Self-selects as Next; or Current Speaker Continues.
This concerns how actions are ordered in conversation.
Talk tends to occur in responsive pairs; however, the pairs may be split over a sequence of turns. An adjacency pair, used in conversational analysis, is a pair of conversational turns by two different speakers such that the production of the first turn (called a first-pair
A pair of turns understood as a preliminary to the main course of action. For example, "guess what"-"what" (as a preliminary to an announcement of some sort) or "what are you doing"-"nothing" (as a preliminary to an invitation or a request).
There are structural (i. e. practice-underwritten) preferences for some types of actions (within sequences of action) in conversation over other actions. For example, responsive actions which agree with, or accept, positions taken by a first action tend to be performed more straightforwardly and faster than actions that disagree with, or decline, those positions (Pomerantz 1984; Davidson 1984). One consequence of this is that agreement and acceptance are promoted over their alternatives, and are more likely to be the outcome of the sequence. Pre-sequences are also a component of preference organization and contribute to this outcome (Schegloff 2007).
Repair organization describes how parties in conversation deal with problems in speaking, hearing, or understanding. Repair is classified by who initiates repair (self or other) and by who resolves the problem (self or other) as well as by how it unfolds within a turn or a sequence of turns.
This concerns the description of the practices by which turns at talk are composed and positioned so as to realize one or another actions.
In contrast to the research inspired by Noam Chomsky which is based on a distinction between competence and performance and dismisses the particulars of actual speech as a degraded form of idealized competence, Conversation Analysis studies naturally-occurring talk on the assumption that spoken interaction is systematically orderly in all its facets (Sacks in Atkinson and Heritage 1984: 21-27). Avram Noam Chomsky (noʊm ˈtʃɑmski born December 7 1928 is an American linguist, Philosopher, cognitive scientist, Political In contrast to the theory developed by John Gumperz, CA maintains it is possible to analyze talk-in-interaction by examining its recordings alone (audio for telephone, video for copresent interaction). John Joseph Gumperz (1922 -) is an American linguist and academic In CA there is no belief that the researcher needs to consult with the talk participants or members of their speech community. Speech community is a concept in Sociolinguistics that describes a more or less discrete group of people who use language in a unique and mutually accepted way among themselves
The following is a list of important phenomena identified in the conversation analysis literature, followed by a brief definition and citations to articles that examine the named phenomenon either empirically or theoretically. Articles in which the term for the phenomenon is coined or which present the canonical treatment of the phenomenon are in bold, those that are otherwise centrally concerned with the phenomenon are in italics, and the rest are articles that otherwise aim to make a significant contribution to an understanding of the phenomenon.