Citizendia

This article deals with elections to the Australian Parliament. The Parliament of Australia or Commonwealth Parliament is the legislative branch of government of Australia. For the Australian state and territories, see Electoral systems of the Australian states and territories. For elections to the Australian Parliament see the Australian electoral system.

Australia
This article is part of a series about the
Politics and government of
Australia

Executive
Queen (Elizabeth II)
Governor-General (Michael Jeffery)
Prime Minister (Kevin Rudd)
Cabinet
Federal Executive Council

Legislative
Parliament
   Senate
   House of Representatives
   Opposition Leader (Brendan Nelson)
Elections
   Federal electoral system
   Electoral divisions
   Election of 1901 · 1972 · 1974 ·
     1975 · 1977 · 1980 · 1983 · 1984 ·
     1987 · 1990 · 1993 · 1996 · 1998 ·
     2001 · 2004 · 2007 · next

Judicial
High Court
Lower Courts
Constitution


Executive
Governors and Administrators
Premiers and Chief Ministers

Legislative
Parliaments and Assemblies
State electoral systems
   ACT · NSW · NT · Qld · SA · Tas ·
     Vic · WA



Greens · Labor · Country Liberal · Family First · Liberal · National



Other countries · Atlas
 Politics Portal
view  talk  edit

The Australian electoral system has evolved over nearly 150 years of continuous democratic government, and has a number of distinctive features including compulsory voting, preferential voting (known elsewhere as instant-runoff voting) and the use of proportional voting to elect the upper house, the Australian Senate. For a topic outline on this subject see List of basic Australia topics. The Politics of Australia take place within the framework of parliamentary democracy. This article describes the federal government of Australia See Australian governments for other jurisdictions In Political science and Constitutional law, the executive is the branch of government responsible for the day-to-day management of the State. TalkCommonewalth realm.-->The monarchy For the ship see RMS Queen Elizabeth 2 Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Context States headed by Elizabeth II The Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia is the representative in Australia of the monarch of Australia (currently Elizabeth II Queen of Australia) Major General Philip Michael Jeffery AC, CVO, MC (born 12 December[[ 937]] was the 24th Governor-General of Australia The Prime Minister of Australia is the Head of government of the Commonwealth of Australia, holding office on commission from the Governor-General. Kevin Michael Rudd (born 21 September 1957 is the 26th and current Prime Minister of Australia and federal leader of the Centre-left Australian Labor The Cabinet of Australia is the council of senior ministers of the Crown, responsible to parliament. The Federal Executive Council is the formal body holding executive authority under the Constitution of Australia. A legislature is a type of representative Deliberative assembly with the power to create amend and change Laws The law created by a legislature is called Legislation The Parliament of Australia or Commonwealth Parliament is the legislative branch of government of Australia. The Senate is the upper of the two houses of the Parliament of Australia. The House of Representatives is one of the two houses (chambers of the Parliament of Australia; it is the Lower house, the Upper house being the Senate This is a List of Australian Leaders of the Opposition, who in Australian Federal Politics is a Member of Parliament in the Brendan John Nelson, MP (born 19 August 1958 is an Australian politician and former Leader of the Opposition in the Parliament of Australia, as leader See also Politics of Australia Australia elects a Legislature the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia using various electoral systems see The Australian House of Representatives is elected from 150 single-member districts called Divisions. Background Following the federation of 1856 - New South Wales, Tasmania and Victoria 1857 - South Australia Issues The 1972 Election was largely focused on domestic policy issues and the role of the federal government in resolving these issues Federal elections were held in Australia on 18 May 1974. All 127 seats in the House of Representatives, and all 60 seats in the Senate Federal elections were held in Australia on 13 December 1975 All 127 seats in the House of Representatives, and all 64 seats in the Senate were up for Background and Issues The election is remembered for the "fistful of dollars" advertisements run by the government offering tax cuts to voters Issues The mood in the electorate was moving against the Fraser Government by 1980 Background The coalition government led by Malcolm Fraser had to contend with a parlous economic situation with high inflation and high unemployment Federal elections were held in Australia on 11 July 1987 following the granting of a double dissolution on 5 June by the Governor-General Sir House of Reps preference flows The Democrats contested 138 electorates with preferences slightly favouring Labor (54 Results House of Representatives preference flows The Nationals had candidates in 13 seats where Three-cornered-contests existed Federal elections were held in Australia on 10 November, 2001. Federal elections were held in Australia on 9 October, 2004. All 150 seats in the House of Representatives and 40 seats in the 76-member Federal elections for the Parliament of Australia were held on Saturday 24 November 2007 after a 6-week campaign in which 13 The next Australian federal election will elect members of the 43rd Parliament of Australia and must be held on or before 16 April 2011 In Law, the judiciary or judicial system is the system of Courts which administer Justice in the name of the sovereign or State The High Court of Australia is the final court of appeal in Australia the highest court in the Australian court hierarchy. There are two streams within the hierarchy of Australian Courts the federal stream and the state and territory stream The Constitution of Australia is the law under which the Australian Commonwealth Government operates The Commonwealth of Australia is made up of 8 states and territories controlled under a federal system of government In Political science and Constitutional law, the executive is the branch of government responsible for the day-to-day management of the State. The Governors of the Australian states are the representatives in the six states of Australia of Australia's monarch Queen Elizabeth II. The Premiers of the Australian states are the de facto heads of the executive governments in the six states of the Commonwealth of Australia. A legislature is a type of representative Deliberative assembly with the power to create amend and change Laws The law created by a legislature is called Legislation The Parliaments of the Australian states and territories are legislative bodies within the federal framework of the Commonwealth of Australia. For elections to the Australian Parliament see the Australian electoral system. } The Australian Capital Territory (ACT is the Capital territory of the Commonwealth of Australia and its smallest self-governing internal territory The form of the Government of New South Wales is prescribed in its Constitution which dates from 1856 although it has been amended many times since then The Northern Territory of Australia is governed according to the principles of the Westminster system, a form of parliamentary government based on the model of the The Government of Queensland is commonly known as the Queensland Government. The form of the Government of South Australia is prescribed in its Constitution which dates from 1856 although it has been amended many times since then The form of the Government of Tasmania is prescribed in its Constitution which dates from 1856 although it has been amended many times since then The Government of Victoria, under the Constitution of Australia, ceded certain legislative and judicial powers to The formation of the Government of Western Australia is prescribed in its Constitution which dates from 1890 although it has been amended many times since then Australia has two tiers of subnational government state (or territory government and local government. Political parties in Australia lists political parties in Australia. The Australian Greens, commonly known as The Greens, is a Green Australian political party. The Country Liberal Party (CLP is a Northern Territory political party affiliated with both the Liberal and National parties The Family First Party is a socially conservative minor Political party in Australia. The Liberal Party of Australia is an Australian political party. The National Party of Australia is an Australian political party. The foreign relations of Australia have spanned from the country's time as Dominion and later Realm of the British Empire to become steadfastly allied with Information on politics by country is available for every Country, including both De jure and De facto independent Compulsory voting requires electors to Vote in Elections or attend a polling place on voting day This article is about voting systems that use ranked ballots For alternative meanings see Preferential voting (disambiguation. Instant-runoff voting ( IRV) is a Voting system used for single-winner elections in which voters have one vote and rank Candidates in order of The Senate is the upper of the two houses of the Parliament of Australia. [1]

Contents

Compulsory voting

Australia enforces compulsory voting, including compulsory enrolment (registration) to vote. For a topic outline on this subject see List of basic Australia topics. Compulsory voting requires electors to Vote in Elections or attend a polling place on voting day [2] Compulsory voting was introduced in 1924 [3]. Year 1924 ( MCMXXIV) was a Leap year starting on Tuesday (link will display the full calendar of the Gregorian calendar. The immediate impetus for compulsory voting at federal level was the low voter turnout (59. 38%) [1] in the federal elections of 1922. Voting is compulsory both at federal elections and at elections for the state and territory legislatures. In some states voting at municipal elections is also compulsory. About 5% of enrolled voters fail to vote at most elections. The electoral roll (or electoral register) is a listing of all those registered to vote in a particular area People in this situation are asked to explain their failure to vote. If no satisfactory reason is provided (for example, illness or religious prohibition), a relatively small fine is imposed ($20-$70)[4] , and failure to pay the fine may result in a court hearing.

It is commonly but wrongly claimed [2] that it is compulsory to only attend a polling place and have one's name checked against the electoral roll. The electoral roll (or electoral register) is a listing of all those registered to vote in a particular area In fact, Section 245 of the Electoral Act [3] says that "It shall be the duty of every elector to vote at each election. . . The Electoral Commissioner must, after polling day at each election, prepare for each Division a list of the names and addresses of the electors who appear to have failed to vote at the election. " A voter who has their name crossed off but then refuses a ballot paper or is seen not to put the ballot in the ballot box will be recorded as having not voted.

Those who do not wish to vote for any of the available candidates sometimes resort to informal voting — placing a blank or incompletely filled out ballot in the ballot box. Even though informal voting is illegal and technically subject to the same penalties as failure to vote, it is impossible to identify or penalise those who do so without violating the secrecy of the ballot. The number of informal votes is recorded, but they are not counted as part of the total number of votes cast. Around 95% of eligible Australians attend polling, and around 5% of Representatives votes are informal [5]

Some political scientists believe that compulsory voting benefits the Australian Labor Party, while others dispute this. It is argued that most of the social groups who would tend not to vote if voting were voluntary are more inclined to vote Labor (people from the ethnic and immigrant communities, indigenous Australians, and people with lower levels of education). This is an article about a class of people as identified and defined within Australian law Occasionally conservative politicians or libertarian intellectuals argue for the abolition of compulsory voting on philosophical grounds, but no government has ever attempted to abolish it. Libertarianism is a term used by a broad spectrum of political philosophies which prioritize individual Liberty and seek to minimize or even abolish the

Following the 2004 federal elections, at which the Liberal-National coalition government won a majority in both Houses, a senior minister, Senator Nick Minchin, said that he favoured the abolition of compulsory voting. Federal elections were held in Australia on 9 October, 2004. All 150 seats in the House of Representatives and 40 seats in the 76-member The Liberal Party of Australia is an Australian political party. The National Party of Australia is an Australian political party. Nicholas Hugh Minchin (born 15 April 1953) Australian politician has been a Liberal member of the Australian Senate since July 1993 The then government gave no indication, however, that it would legislate to this effect, and indeed did not do so before being defeated in the 2007 federal election. Some prominent Liberals, such as Petro Georgiou, former chair of the Parliament's Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, have spoken in favour of compulsory voting. Petro Georgiou (born 30 November 1947) Australian politician has been a Liberal member of the Australian House of Representatives

Because it maximises voter turnout, compulsory voting also maximises the quantum of campaign cost reimbursement--public moneys paid to candidates and parties polling a minimum of 4 per cent at an election.

Preferential voting

Australia uses various forms of preferential voting for almost all elections. This article is about voting systems that use ranked ballots For alternative meanings see Preferential voting (disambiguation. Under this system, voters number the candidates on the ballot paper in the order of their preference. The preferential system was introduced in 1918, in response to the rise of the Country Party, a party representing small farmers. Year 1918 ( MCMXVIII) was a Common year starting on Tuesday (link will display the full calendar of the Gregorian calendar (or a Common The National Party of Australia is an Australian political party. The Country Party split the anti-Labor vote in conservative country areas, allowing Labor candidates to win on a minority vote. The conservative government of Billy Hughes introduced preferential voting as a means of allowing competition between the two conservative parties without putting seats at risk. William Morris 'Billy' Hughes, CH, KC (25 September 1862 &ndash 28 October 1952 Australian politician was the seventh Prime Minister of Australia It was first used at the Corangamite by-election on 14 December 1918 [4]. It had previously been introduced as a result of the work of Thomas Hare and Andrew Inglis Clark in the Tasmanian House of Assembly. Thomas Hare (born in England 28 March 1806; died 6 May 1891) was a British proponent of electoral reform Andrew Inglis Clark (24 February 1848–14 November 1907 was an Australian politician The House of Assembly, or lower house is one of the two chambers of the Parliament of Tasmania in Australia

Preferential voting has gradually extended to both upper and lower houses, in the federal, state and territory legislatures, and is also used in municipal elections, and most other kinds of elections as well, such as internal political party elections, trade union elections, church elections, elections to company boards and elections in voluntary bodies such as football clubs. Negotiations for disposition of preference recommendations to voters are taken very seriously by candidates owing to the fact that transferred preferences carry the same weight as primary votes. The federal Senate electoral system and those for some state legislatures now provide for simultaneous registration of party-listed candidates and party-determined orders of voting preference, known as 'group voting tickets'.

Under this system, voters can opt to either 'vote above the line' simply by placing the number '1' in a single box or to 'vote below the line' by numbering a large number of individual candidate's boxes in the order of their own preference. In the latter option, there is a risk that the vote will be declared invalid ('informal') if any number in the sequence is inadvertently duplicated or omitted. However, an estimated 95% of all votes are cast 'above the line', meaning that the precise valuation of those votes is passed to the control of the party receiving the single primary vote. The electoral authority automatically allocates preferences, or votes, in the predetermined order outlined in the group voting ticket. Each party or group can register up to three group voting tickets. This highly complex system has potential for unexpected outcomes, including the possible election of a candidate who may have initially received an insignificant primary vote tally.

With the exception of an experiment with voting machines in the Australian Capital Territory [5], all Australian elections are carried out using paper ballots. } The Australian Capital Territory (ACT is the Capital territory of the Commonwealth of Australia and its smallest self-governing internal territory

Gerrymandering and malapportionment

Australian history has seen very little gerrymandering of electoral boundaries, which have nearly always been drawn up by civil servants or independent boundary commissioners. Gerrymandering is a form of redistribution in which electoral district or Constituency boundaries are manipulated for electoral advantage But Australia has seen systematic malapportionment of electorates (the allocation of more or fewer electoral districts to one part of a country or state than its population would merit), and indeed until fairly recently this was considered a perfectly natural and defensible practice in some states. Apportionment is the process of allocating political power among a set of principles (or defined constituencies

All the colonial legislatures before Federation, and the federal parliament after it, saw country districts allocated more representation than their populations merited. A federation ( Latin: foedus, covenant is a union comprising a number of partially self-governing states or regions united by a central ("federal" This was justified on several grounds: that country people had to contend with greater distances and hardships and thus deserved greater representation; that country people (and specifically farmers) produced most of the nation's real wealth, and thus deserved greater representation; and that greater country representation was necessary to balance the radical tendencies of the urban population.

In the 19th century these assertions usually reflected genuinely held beliefs. By the 20th century, and especially after the rise of the Labor Party, they became increasingly self-serving rationalisations by politicians (usually conservatives) who benefitted from the malapportionment. In the later 20th century these arguments were increasingly and usually successfully challenged, and the malapportionment was reduced and finally abolished in all states.

The most conspicuous examples of malapportionment were South Australia, Queensland and Western Australia. South Australia is a state of Australia in the southern central part of the country Queensland is a state of Australia, occupying the north-eastern corner of the mainland continent Western Australia is a state occupying the entire western third of the Australian continent.

In South Australia the 1856 Constitution stipulated that there must be two rural constituencies for every urban constituency, and this remained in force until 1968, by which time the urban-rural voter ratio was almost exactly reversed: that is, there were two urban voters for every rural voter. Year 1968 ( MCMLXVIII) was a Leap year starting on Monday (link will display full calendar of the Gregorian calendar. As a result, rural seats had on average one-quarter the number of voters that urban seats had. This gross distortion enabled Sir Thomas Playford to hold office as Liberal and Country League premier of South Australia from 1938 to 1965, despite losing several elections by wide margins in terms of votes. Sir Thomas Playford, GCMG (5 July 1896 – 16 June 1981 was a South Australian politician and a well known farmer The Liberal and Country League (LCL was a major political party in South Australia throughout its forty year existence Year 1965 ( MCMLXV) was a Common year starting on Friday (link will display full calendar of the 1965 Gregorian calendar. This arrangement was popularly called "the Playmander," although it was not strictly speaking a gerrymander. The Playmander was a form of electoral malapportionment in the Australian state of South Australia, in place from 1936 to 1968

In Queensland, the malapportionment initially benefitted the Labor Party, since many small rural constituencies were dominated by rural workers organised into the powerful Australian Workers Union. Template talkInfobox Union for usage --> The Australian Workers' Union (AWU is one of Australia 's largest But after 1957, the Country Party (later renamed the National Party) governments of Sir Frank Nicklin and Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen were able to manipulate the electoral system so that the National Party could win elections with only a quarter of the first preference votes. Year 1957 ( MCMLVII) was a Common year starting on Tuesday (link displays the 1957 Gregorian calendar) The National Party of Australia is an Australian political party. Sir George Francis Reuben Nicklin KCMG, MM ( 6 August 1895 - 29 January 1978) was Premier of the Australian Sir Johannes "Joh" Bjelke-Petersen KCMG (13 January 1911 &ndash 23 April 2005] New Zealand -born Australian Politician, was the longest-serving This "Bjelkemander" was not overcome until the final defeat of the Nationals in 1989. The Bjelkemander was the term given to a system of Malapportionment in the Australian State of Queensland in the 1970s and 1980s Year 1989 ( MCMLXXXIX) was a Common year starting on Sunday (link displays 1989 Gregorian calendar)

Western Australia retained a significant malapportionment until 2005. Western Australia is a state occupying the entire western third of the Australian continent. Year 2005 ( MMV) was a Common year starting on Saturday (link displays full calendar of the Gregorian calendar. On 20 May 2005 the state Parliament passed new electoral laws, removing the malapportionment. Events 325 - The First Council of Nicaea &ndash the first Ecumenical Council of the Christian Church is held Year 2005 ( MMV) was a Common year starting on Saturday (link displays full calendar of the Gregorian calendar. Under the previous system, votes in the country were worth up to four times the value of votes in Perth, the state's capital city. Perth is the capital and largest city of the Australian state of Western Australia. Under the new laws, electorates must have a population of 21,343, with a permitted variation of 10%. Electorates with a land area of more than 100,000km² (40,000 mi²) are permitted to have a variation of 20% in recognition of the difficulty of representing the sparsely populated north and east of the state. [6]

Additionally, large district would be attributed and extra number of notional voters, equal to 1. 5% the area of the district in square kilometres, for the purposes of this calculation. This Large District Allowance will permit large rural districts to have many fewer voters than the average district enrolment. The West Australian Electoral Commission [7] gives the following example: Central Kimberley-Pilbara district has 12601 electors and an area of 600038 square kilometres. The average district enrolment for WA is 21343. Central Kimberley-Pilbara thus obtains 9000 notional extra electors, bringing its notional total to 21601, which is acceptably close to the average district enrolment.

The Parliament

The Parliament of Australia is a bicameral (two-house) Parliament. The Parliament of Australia or Commonwealth Parliament is the legislative branch of government of Australia. It combines some of the features of the Parliament of the United Kingdom with some features of the United States Congress. The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the supreme legislative body in the United Kingdom and British overseas territories The United States Congress is the bicameral Legislature of the federal government of the United States of America, consisting of two houses This is because the authors of the Australian Constitution had two objectives: to reproduce as faithfully as possible the Westminster system of parliamentary government, while creating a federation in which there would be a division of powers between the national government and the states, regulated by a written Constitution. The Constitution of Australia is the law under which the Australian Commonwealth Government operates The Westminster system is a democratic Parliamentary system of Government modelled after the British government (the Parliament of the United

In structure, the Australian Parliament resembles the United States Congress. There is a House of Representatives elected from single-member constituencies of approximately equal population, and there is a Senate consisting of an equal number of Senators from each state, regardless of population (there are also Senators representing the territories).

But in function, the Australian Parliament follows the Westminster system. The Prime Minister holds office because he can command the support of the majority of the House of Representatives, and must resign or advise an immediate election if the House passes a vote of no confidence in his administration. All ministers are members of Parliament (although the Constitution permits a person who is not currently a member of parliament to hold a ministerial portfolio for a maximum period of three months).

The House of Representatives

A sample ballot paper from NSW for the House of Representatives.
A sample ballot paper from NSW for the House of Representatives.

The Australian House of Representatives has 150 members elected from single-member constituencies (usually called seats or electorates in Australia; see Australian electorates) for three-year terms. The House of Representatives is one of the two houses (chambers of the Parliament of Australia; it is the Lower house, the Upper house being the Senate The Australian House of Representatives is elected from 150 single-member districts called Divisions. Voters must fill out the ballot paper by numbering all the candidates in order of their preference. Failure to number all the candidates, or an error in numbering, renders the ballot informal (invalid) [8]. The average number of candidates has tended to increase in recent years: there are frequently 10 or 12 candidates in a seat, and at the Wills by-election in April 1992 there were 22 candidates. This has made voting increasingly onerous, but the rate of informal voting has increased only slightly.

A "how-to-vote" card from the Australian federal election of 2004, showing voters how to fill in the squares on the ballot paper if they wish to vote for the Liberal Party of Australia. Voters must number every square in the order of their preference to cast a valid vote.
A "how-to-vote" card from the Australian federal election of 2004, showing voters how to fill in the squares on the ballot paper if they wish to vote for the Liberal Party of Australia. Voters must number every square in the order of their preference to cast a valid vote.

The low rate of informal voting is largely attributed to advertising from the various political parties indicated how a voter should number their ballot paper, called a How-to-Vote Card. On election day, volunteers from political parties stand outside polling places, handing voters a card which advises them how to cast their vote for their respective party. Thus, if a voter wishes to vote for the Liberal Party, they may take the Liberal How-to-Vote Card and follow its instructions. The Liberal Party of Australia is an Australian political party. While they can lodge their vote according to their own preferences, Australian voters show a high degree of party loyalty in following their chosen party's card.

The challenge of numbering the ballot paper leads a certain number of voters to simply number the candidates sequentially from 1 to the number of candidates down the ballot paper. This practice is commonly referred to as donkey voting. In Australia, where all State Federal and Territory Electoral systems combine compulsory turnout with some form of Preferential voting, a donkey vote refers It gives some advantage to the candidate at the top of the ballot paper. Before 1984, candidates appeared in alphabetical order, which led to a profusion of Aaronses and Abbotts contesting elections. Year 1984 ( MCMLXXXIV) was a Leap year starting on Sunday (link displays the 1984 Gregorian calendar) (The most famous example of this was the 1937 election, in which the Labor Senate ticket in New South Wales consisted of candidates named Armour, Ashley, Armstrong and Arthur: all were elected. John Ignatius Armstrong AC ( 10 July 1908 &ndash 10 March 1977) was an Australian politician and federal minister ) Since 1984 ballot paper order has been decided at random by drawing lots prior to printing of the ballot papers.

The House Count

The form of preferential voting used in the House of Representatives is known in other countries such as the USA as instant runoff voting, IRV or the alternative ballot. Instant-runoff voting ( IRV) is a Voting system used for single-winner elections in which voters have one vote and rank Candidates in order of

When the polls close at 6pm on election day, the votes are counted. The count is conducted by officers of the Australian Electoral Commission, watched by nominated volunteer observers from the political parties, called scrutineers. The Australian Electoral Commission, or the AEC is the federal government agency in charge of organising and supervising federal elections and referendums The votes from each polling booth in the electorate are tallied at the office of the returning officer for the electorate. In various parliamentary systems a Returning Officer is responsible for overseeing Elections in one or more constituencies If one of the candidates has more than 50% of the vote, then she or he is declared elected. Australian politics are influenced by social and economic demographics, though the correlation between "class" and voting is not always simple [9]. Typically, the Labor Party will poll higher in strongly working-class seats, the Liberal party in middle-class seats, and the National Party in rural seats. In a strong seat, the elected party might win up to 80% of the two-party preferred vote. In the 2004 Federal Election, the highest winning margin in a seat was 25. 1% [10], with most seats marginal by less than 10%.

In the remaining seats, no single candidate will have a majority of the primary votes (or first-preference votes). A hypothetical result might look like this:

White (Democrat)6,00006. 0%
Smith (Labor)45,00045. 0%
Jones (Liberal)35,00035. 0%
Johnson (Green)10,00010. 0%
Davies (Ind)4,00004. 0%

On election night, an interim distribution of preferences called a TCP (Two Candidate Preferred) count is performed. The electoral commission nominates the two candidates it believes are most likely to win the most votes and all votes are distributed immediately to one or the other preferred candidate[11]. This result is indicative only and subsequently the formal count will be performed after all "declaration" (e. g. postal, absent votes) votes are received.

In this example, the candidate with the smallest vote, Davies, will be eliminated, and his or her preferences will be distributed: that is, his or her 4,000 votes will be individually re-allocated to the remaining candidates according to which candidate received the number 2 vote on each of those 4000 ballot papers. Suppose Davies's preferences split 50/50 between Smith and Jones. After re-allocation of Davies's votes, Smith would have 47% and Jones 37% of the total votes in the electorate. White would then be eliminated. Suppose all of White's preferences went to Smith. Smith would then have 53% and would be declared elected. Johnson's votes would not need to be distributed.

Here is a real example of the operation of preferential voting in Australia, from the federal election of 1990: Charles Blunt was the leader of the conservative National Party of Australia, representing Richmond, a traditional National Party seat in northern New South Wales. Year 1990 ( MCMXC) was a Common year starting on Monday (link displays the 1990 Gregorian calendar) Charles William Blunt (born 19 January 1951) Australian politician and businessman was born in Sydney, New South Wales, and graduated The National Party of Australia is an Australian political party. The intervention of the anti-nuclear campaigner, Dr Helen Caldicott, allowed the Labor candidate, Neville Newell, to win the seat despite polling only 27% of the primary vote. Helen Caldicott (born 1938 is an Australian Physician, author and Anti-nuclear advocate who has founded several associations dedicated to opposing Neville Joseph Newell (born 14 October 1952) is an Australian politician Note that Caldicott also had a good chance of winning the seat – if all of Gibbs' preferences had gone to her as directed on the How-to-Vote card, she would have drawn ahead of Newell and won on his preferences.

RICHMOND, NSW                  73,794 enrolled, 70,571 (95. 6%) voted====================================================================North Coast NSW: Byron Bay, Lismore, Murwillumbah, Tweed Heads--------------------------------------------------------------------1987 two-party majority: NPA over ALP 06. 6--------------------------------------------------------------------Stan Gibbs                      AD       4,346   06. 3  (-00. 8)Neville Newell                  ALP     18,423   26. 7  (-08. 5)Gavin Baillie                              187   00. 3   Alan Sims                       CTA      1,032   01. 5   Ian Paterson                               445   00. 6   Dudley Leggett                             279   00. 4   Charles Blunt *                 NPA     28,257   40. 9  (-10. 2)Dr Helen Caldicott                      16,072   23. 3--------------------------------------------------------------------1,530 (02. 2%) informal                  69,041--------------------------------------------------------------------Caldicott was an independent Green candidate. --------------------------------------------------------------------
2nd count: Baillie's 187 votes distributed--------------------------------------------------------------------Gibbs                 34 (18. 4)          4,380   06. 3Newell                44 (23. 8)         18,467   26. 7Sims                  21 (11. 4)          1,053   01. 5Paterson              35 (18. 9)            480   00. 7Leggett               15 (08. 1)            294   00. 4Blunt *               17 (09. 2)         28,274   41. 0Caldicott             19 (10. 3)         16,091   23. 3(exhausted             2                     2                     )-------------------------------------------------------------------->                    187                69,041--------------------------------------------------------------------  
3rd count: Leggett's 294 votes distributed--------------------------------------------------------------------Gibbs                 40 (13. 9)          4,420   06. 4Newell                17 (05. 9)         18,484   26. 8Sims                   6 (02. 1)          1,059   01. 5Paterson              50 (17. 4)            530   00. 8Blunt *               29 (10. 1)         28,303   41. 0Caldicott            146 (50. 7)         16,237   23. 5(exhausted             6                     8                     )-------------------------------------------------------------------->                    294                69,041--------------------------------------------------------------------
4th count: Paterson's 530 votes distributed--------------------------------------------------------------------Gibbs                 84 (16. 3)          4,504   06. 5Newell                60 (11. 7)         18,544   26. 9Sims                  57 (11. 1)          1,116   01. 6Blunt *              113 (21. 9)         28,416   41. 2Caldicott            201 (39. 0)         16,438   23. 8(exhausted            15                    23                     )-------------------------------------------------------------------->                    530                69,041--------------------------------------------------------------------
5th count: Sims's 1,116 votes distributed--------------------------------------------------------------------Gibbs                179 (16. 3)          4,683   06. 8Newell               139 (12. 6)         18,683   27. 1Blunt *              562 (51. 1)         28,978   42. 0Caldicott            220 (20. 0)         16,658   24. 1(exhausted            16                    39                     )-------------------------------------------------------------------->                  1,116                69,041--------------------------------------------------------------------
6th count: Gibbs's 4,683 votes distributed--------------------------------------------------------------------Newell             1,555 (33. 8)         20,238   29. 4Blunt *              800 (17. 4)         29,778   43. 2Caldicott          2,245 (48. 8)         18,903   27. 4(exhausted            83                   122                     )-------------------------------------------------------------------->                  4,683                69,041--------------------------------------------------------------------
7th count: Caldicott's 18,903 votes distributed--------------------------------------------------------------------NEWELL            14,426 (77. 4)         34,664   50. 5Blunt *            4,202 (22. 6)         33,980   49. 5(exhausted           275                   397                     )-------------------------------------------------------------------->                 18,903                69,041   00. 5    07. 1 to ALP--------------------------------------------------------------------

The exhausted counts correspond to votes that ought to be informal, if strictly following the rules above, but were deemed to have expressed some valid preferences. The Electoral Act has since been amended to almost eliminate exhausted votes.

Two-party majorities, swings and pendulums

Since 1984 the preferences of all candidates in House of Representatives seats have been distributed, even if this is not necessary to determine the winner of the seat. This is done to determine the percentage of the votes obtained by the winning candidate after the distribution of all preferences. This is called the two-party preferred vote. For example, if (in the example given above), Smith finished with 58% of the vote after the distribution of Johnson's preferences, Smith's two-party vote would be 58% and the seat would be said to have a two-party majority of 8%. It would therefore need a two-party swing of 8% to be lost to the other side of politics at the next election.

Once the two-party majorities in all seats are known, they can then be arranged in a table to show the order in which they would be lost in the event of an adverse swing at the next election. Such tables frequently appear in the Australian media and are called election pendulums or sometimes Mackerras pendulums after the political scientist Malcolm Mackerras, who popularised the idea of the two-party vote in his 1972 book Australian General Elections. Malcolm Hugh Mackerras AO (born 26 August 1939— is an Australian psephologist and Commentator and lecturer on Australian and American

Here is a sample of the federal election pendulum from the 2001 election, showing some of the seats held by the Liberal-National Party coalition government, in order of their two-party majority. Federal elections were held in Australia on 10 November, 2001. A seat with a small two-party majority is said to be a marginal seat or a swinging seat. A seat with a large two-party majority is said to be a safe seat, although "safe" seats have been known to change hands in the event of a large swing.

SeatStateMajorityMemberParty
HINKLERQld00. 0Paul NevilleNPA
SOLOMONNT00. 1Dave TollnerLib
ADELAIDESA00. 2Hon Trish WorthLib
CANNINGWA00. 4Don RandallLib
DOBELLNSW00. 4Ken TicehurstLib
PARRAMATTANSW01. 1Ross CameronLib
McEWENVic01. 2Fran BaileyLib
PATERSONNSW01. 4Bob BaldwinLib
HERBERTQld01. 6Peter LindsayLib
RICHMONDNSW01. 6Hon Larry AnthonyNPA
DEAKINVic01. 7Philip BarresiLib
EDEN-MONARONSW01. 7Gary NairnLib
HINDMARSHSA01. 9Hon Christine GallusLib

Redistributions

The boundaries of Australian electoral constituencies are drawn up by the Australian Electoral Commission, an independent statutory authority, completely independent of political considerations. The term redistribution is used in Australia to mean a redrawing of electoral boundaries The Australian Electoral Commission, or the AEC is the federal government agency in charge of organising and supervising federal elections and referendums Members of Parliament and political parties may make submissions to the Commission on proposed new boundaries, but any interference with the Commission's deliberations would be a serious offence.

The Electoral Act requires that all seats have approximately equal numbers of enrolled voters. The electoral roll (or electoral register) is a listing of all those registered to vote in a particular area When the Commission determines that population shifts within a state have caused some seats to have too many or too few voters, new boundaries are drawn up. This is called a redistribution. Redistributions are also held when the Commission determines (following a formula laid down in the Act) that the distribution of seats among the states and territories must be changed because some states are growing faster than others.

In 2003, for example, redistributions were held in Victoria, Queensland and South Australia. Year 2003 ( MMIII) was a Common year starting on Wednesday of the Gregorian calendar. South Australia lost one seat, while Queensland gained a seat. Victoria kept the same number of seats, but one seat was abolished and one new seat created.

Casual vacancies

If a member's seat becomes vacant mid-term, whether through resignation, death or some other possible reasons, a by-election may be held. A by-election or bye-election (called special election in the United States) is an Election held to fill a political office that has become vacant Further details are at Casual vacancy (Australian Parliament). This page is about casual vacancies in the Australian Parliament

The Senate

A sample ballot paper for the Senate.
A sample ballot paper for the Senate.

The Australian Senate has 76 members: each of the six states elects 12 Senators, and the Northern Territory (NT) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) each elect two Senators. The Senate is the upper of the two houses of the Parliament of Australia. The Commonwealth of Australia is made up of 8 states and territories controlled under a federal system of government The several other Australian Territories have very small populations and are represented by Northern Territory and ACT Senators (for example, Christmas Island residents are represented by NT Senators, while Jervis Bay Territory residents are represented by ACT Senators). The Territory of Christmas Island is a small territory of Australia located in the Indian Ocean, 2600 kilometres (1600 mi northwest of The Jervis Bay Territory is a territory of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Senators for the states serve six-year terms, with half the Senators from each state being elected at each federal election. The terms of the territory Senators coincide with the duration of the House of Representatives.

The Senate is elected both proportionately and preferentially, except that each state has an equal number of seats so that the distribution of seats to states is non-proportional to the total Australian population. Thus, although within each state the seats proportionally represent the vote for that state, overall the smaller states are proportionally stronger in representation for their population compared to larger states.

In each state, political parties which are registered with the Electoral Commission present lists of candidates, which appear as a group on the Senate ballot paper. Independents and members of unregistered parties can also nominate, but they cannot appear on ballot paper as a group.

Voters can vote for the Senate in one of two ways. They can number all the candidates, as they would with a House of Representatives ballot: but since there may be 50 or 60 candidates on the ballot paper, few voters do this. This is called below the line voting. Or they can simply write "1" in a box indicating which party list for which they wish to vote. This is called above the line voting. Over 95% of voters cast their votes above the line.

The Senate Count

The form of preferential voting used in the Senate is technically known as the single transferable vote or STV. Single transferable vote (STV is a preferential Voting system designed to minimize Wasted votes and provide Proportional representation

The system for counting Senate votes is very complicated, and a final result is sometimes not known for several weeks. When the Senate vote is counted, a quota for election is determined. This is the number of valid votes cast, divided by the number of Senators to be elected plus one.

For example, here is the Senate result for the state of New South Wales from the 1998 federal election. For greater clarity the votes cast for 50 minor party and independent candidates have been excluded.

The quota for election was 3,755,725 divided by seven, or 536,533.

Enrolment:                              4,031,749Turnout:                                3,884,333 (96. 3%)Informal votes:                           128,608 (03. 3%)Formal votes:                           3,755,725Quota for election:                       536,533--------------------------------------------------------------------Steve HUTCHINS                  ALP     1,446,231   38. 5  ELECTED 1Hon John Faulkner *             ALP         2,914   00. 1  Group HMichael Forshaw *               ALP           864   00. 0  Q:2. 7073Ursula Stephens                 ALP         2,551   00. 1  
David Oldfield                  ON        359,654   09. 6  Group KBrian Burston                   ON            570   00. 0  Q:0. 6729Bevan O'Regan                   ON            785   00. 0
Bill HEFFERNAN *                Lib     1,371,578   36. 5  ELECTED 2Dr John Tierney *               Lib         1,441   00. 0  Group LSandy Macdonald *               NPA         1,689   00. 0  Q:2. 5638Concetta Fierravanti-Wells      Lib           855   00. 0  
Aden Ridgeway                   AD        272,481   07. 3  Group MMatthew Baird                   AD            457   00. 0  Q:0. 5142Suzzanne Reddy                  AD          2,163   00. 1  David Mendelssohn               AD            809   00. 0
John Sutton                     Grn        80,073   02. 1  Group UCatherine Moore                 Grn           748   00. 0  Q:0. 1521Lee Rhiannon                    Grn           249   00. 0Suzie Russell                   Grn           542   00. 0--------------------------------------------------------------------128,608 (03. 3%) informal                3,755,725--------------------------------------------------------------------

In this table, the Group number allocated to each list is shown at right. Below that is the number of quotas polled by each list. Thus, "Q:2. 7073" next to the Labor Party list indicates that the Labor candidates between them polled 2. 7073 quotas.

It will be seen that the leading Labor and Liberal candidates, Hutchins and Heffernan, polled more than the quota. They were therefore elected on the first count. Their surplus votes were then distributed. The surplus is the candidate's vote minus the quota. Hutchins's surplus was thus 1,446,231 minus 536,533, or 909,698. These votes were distributed to whichever candidates received the no 2 votes on Hutchins's ballots.

After Hutchins's surplus votes were distributed, the count looked like this:

                     Votes             Total after                      distributed       distribution--------------------------------------------------------------------HUTCHINS                   E              536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 1FAULKNER *           908,567 (99. 9)       911,481   24. 3  ELECTED 3Forshaw *                196 (00. 0)         1,060   00. 0Stephens                 130 (00. 0)         2,681   00. 1
Oldfield                 186 (00. 0)       359,840   09. 6Burston                    6 (00. 0)           576   00. 0O'Regan                    4 (00. 0)           789   00. 0
HEFFERNAN *                E            1,371,578   36. 5  ELECTED 2Tierney *                 13 (00. 0)         1,454   00. 0Macdonald *                1 (00. 0)         1,690   00. 0Fierravanti-Wells          1 (00. 0)           856   00. 0
Ridgeway                 278 (00. 0)       272,579   07. 3Baird                      5 (00. 0)           462   00. 0Reddy                      3 (00. 0)         2,166   00. 1Mendelssohn                4 (00. 0)           813   00. 0
Sutton                    66 (00. 0)        80,139   02. 1Moore                      2 (00. 0)           750   00. 0Rhiannon                   1 (00. 0)           250   00. 0Russell                    0                  542   00. 0--------------------------------------------------------------------                     909,698            3,755,725--------------------------------------------------------------------

It will be seen that virtually all of Hutchins's surplus votes went to Faulkner, the second candidate on the Labor ticket, and he was then elected. This is because all those voters who voted for the Labor party "above the line" had their second preferences automatically allocated to the second Labor candidate. All parties lodge a copy of their How-to-Vote Card with the Electoral Commission, and the Commission follows this card in allocating the preferences of those who vote "above the line. " If a voter wished to vote, for example, Hutchins 1 and Heffernan 2, they would need to vote "below the line" by numbering each of the 69 candidates.

In the third count, Heffernan's surplus was distributed and these votes elected Tierney. Faulkner's surplus was then distributed, but these were insufficient to elect Forshaw. Likewise, Tierney's surplus was insufficient to elect McDonald.

After this stage of the count, the remaining candidates in contention (that is, the leading candidates in the major party tickets) were in the following position:

--------------------------------------------------------------------HUTCHINS                                  536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 1FAULKNER *                                536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 3Forshaw *                                 375,587   10. 0Oldfield                                  360,263   09. 6HEFFERNAN *                               536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 2Tierney *                                 536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 4Macdonald *                               300,313   08. 0Ridgeway                                  273,109   07. 3Sutton                                     80,186   02. 1--------------------------------------------------------------------                                        3,755,725--------------------------------------------------------------------

All the other candidates were then eliminated one by one, starting with the candidates with the smallest number of votes, and their votes were distributed among the candidates remaining in contention in accordance with the preferences expressed on their ballot papers. After this process was completed, the remaining candidates were in the following position:

--------------------------------------------------------------------HUTCHINS                                  536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 1FAULKNER *                                536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 3Forshaw *                                 450,446   12. 0Oldfield                                  402,154   10. 7HEFFERNAN *                               536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 2Tierney *                                 536,533   14. 3  ELECTED 4Macdonald *                               357,572   09. 5Ridgeway                                  286,157   07. 6Sutton                                    112,602   03. 0--------------------------------------------------------------------                                        3,755,725--------------------------------------------------------------------

Sutton was then eliminated. 80% of Sutton's preferences went to Ridgeway, giving Ridgeway more votes than McDonald. McDonald was then eliminated, and 93% of his preferences went to Ridgeway, thus giving him a quota and the fifth Senate seat. Ridgeway's surplus was then distributed, and 96% of his votes went to Forshaw, thus giving him a quota and the sixth seat. Oldfield was the last remaining unsuccessful candidate.

A final point needs to be explained. It was noted above that when a candidate polls more votes than the quota, their suplus vote is distributed to other candidates. Thus, in the example given above, Hutchins's surplus was 909,698, or 1,446,231 (his primary vote) minus 536,533 (the quota). It may be asked: which 909,698 of Hutchins's 1,446,231 primary votes are distributed? Are they chosen at random from among his votes? In fact they are all distributed, but at less than their full value. Since 909,698 is 62. 9% of 1,446,231, each of Hutchins's votes is transferred to other candidates as 62. 9% of a vote: each vote is said to have a transfer value of 0. 629. This avoids any possibility of an unrepresentative sample of his votes being transferred. After each count the candidate's progressive total is rounded down to the nearest whole number. This means that a small number of votes are lost by fractionation in the final count.

When a person is appointed Divisional Returning Officer for a seat, his electoral enrolment will be transferred from the electorate where he lives to the one he administers. Normally he will be precluded from voting at an election, but instead will have two special powers; these are:

1. If during the count there are two candidates with equal lowest votes, he can decide which will be excluded.

2. If at the end of the count the two candidates left have an equal number of votes, he will get to vote in the election by giving a casting vote to the candidate he prefers. This is his personal vote, just like any other elector's, and is awarded at his sole discretion.

Casual vacancies

If a senator's seat becomes vacant mid-term, whether through resignation, death or some other possible reasons, the parliament of the relevant state or the legislative assembly of the relevant territory chooses a replacement senator. Further details are at Casual vacancy (Australian Parliament). This page is about casual vacancies in the Australian Parliament

Double Dissolutions

Under the Australian Constitution, the House of Representatives and the Senate generally have equal legislative powers (the only exception being that appropriation (money) bills must originate in the House of Representatives). The Constitution of Australia is the law under which the Australian Commonwealth Government operates This means that a government formed in the House of Representatives can be seriously frustrated by a Senate majority determined to reject its legislation.

In these circumstances, Section 57 of the Constitution allows the governor-general to dissolve the House of Representatives and the entire Senate – this is called a "double dissolution" – and issue writs for an election in which every seat in the Parliament is contested.

Section 57 provides:

If the House of Representatives passes any proposed law, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the House of Representatives, in the same or the next session, again passes the proposed law with or without any amendments which have been made, suggested, or agreed to by the Senate, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, the Governor-General may dissolve the Senate and the House of Representatives simultaneously. But such dissolution shall not take place within six months before the date of the expiry of the House of Representatives by effluxion of time.

Section 57 also provides that if, after a double dissolution, the Senate again rejects the bill or bills that were the subject of the dissolution, the governor-general may convene a joint sitting of the two houses to consider the bill or bills, and any amendments which have been previously proposed in either house. At a joint sitting, the members of both houses vote as one body upon bills and amendments; and if, at the joint sitting, a bill or an amendment is accepted by an absolute majority of the total membership of the House and Senate put together, it is treated as though it had been passed separately by both houses, and is presented for Royal Assent. An absolute majority or majority of the entire membership (in American English, a Supermajority Voting requirement is a Voting basis

There were double dissolutions in 1914, 1951, 1974, 1975, 1983 and 1987. History In 1944, Sir Robert Menzies founded the Liberal Party of Australia (descended from the United Australia Party) Federal elections were held in Australia on 18 May 1974. All 127 seats in the House of Representatives, and all 60 seats in the Senate Federal elections were held in Australia on 13 December 1975 All 127 seats in the House of Representatives, and all 64 seats in the Senate were up for Background The coalition government led by Malcolm Fraser had to contend with a parlous economic situation with high inflation and high unemployment Federal elections were held in Australia on 11 July 1987 following the granting of a double dissolution on 5 June by the Governor-General Sir However, the 1974 Joint Sitting is so far the only one held pursuant to Section 57 [6].

The following table is a summary of the relevant details:

Date of
Double Dissolution
Date of ElectionGovernor-GeneralPrime MinisterLeader of the OppositionOutcome
30 July 19145 September 1914Sir Ronald Munro-FergusonJoseph CookAndrew FisherThe Cook Commonwealth Liberal Party government was defeated by Andrew Fisher's Australian Labor Party. Ronald Craufurd Munro-Ferguson 1st Viscount Novar, KT GCMG PC ( 6 March 1860 &ndash 30 March 1934) sixth For the actor Joe Cook see Joe Cook (actor. Sir Joseph Cook, GCMG (7 December 1860 &ndash 30 July 1947 was an Australian Andrew Fisher (29 August 1862 – 22 October 1928 was an Australian Politician and the fifth Prime Minister of Australia. For the modern Liberal Party of Australia see Liberal Party of Australia The Commonwealth Liberal Party (CLP also known as The Fusion
19 March 195128 April 1951Sir William McKellRobert MenziesBen ChifleyThe Menzies Liberal-Country Party coalition government was opposed by Chifley's Labor Party, but was returned with a majority in both houses. History In 1944, Sir Robert Menzies founded the Liberal Party of Australia (descended from the United Australia Party) Sir William John McKell GCMG (26 September 1891 - 11 January 1985 Australian politician was Premier of New South Wales from 1941 to 1947 and was Sir Robert Gordon Menzies, KT, AK, CH, QC (20 December 1894 - 15 May 1978 Australian politician was the twelfth person to serve Joseph Benedict Chifley (22 September 1885 &ndash 13 June 1951 Australian politician and 16th Prime Minister of Australia, was one of Australia's most influential Prime Ministers The Liberal Party of Australia is an Australian political party. The National Party of Australia is an Australian political party.
11 April 197418 May 1974Sir Paul HasluckGough WhitlamBilly SneddenThe Whitlam Labor government was returned, but still without a majority in the Senate. Federal elections were held in Australia on 18 May 1974. All 127 seats in the House of Representatives, and all 60 seats in the Senate Sir Paul Meernaa Caedwalla Hasluck KG GCMG GCVO (1 April 1905&ndash9 January 1993 was an Australian historian poet public servant and Edward Gough Whitlam, AC, QC (born 11 July 1916 known as Gough Whitlam (ˈɡɒf goff is an Australian former politician and 21st Sir Billy Mackie Snedden KCMG QC (31 December 1926 27 June 1987 was an Australian politician representing the Liberal Party. The bills were reintroduced and again rejected by the coalition-controlled Senate. Sir Paul Hasluck's term ended on 11 July and the new Governor-General Sir John Kerr approved Whitlam's request for a joint sitting, held on 6-7 August 1974, at which all the bills were passed. John Kerr may refer to one of the following Government and politics John Kerr (Governor-General (1914&ndash1991 Australian Governor-General
11 November 197513 December 1975Sir John KerrMalcolm Fraser (caretaker)Gough WhitlamFraser, who, as Leader of the Liberal-Country coalition Opposition, had opposed the bills, had been appointed caretaker Prime Minister in extraordinary circumstances following Kerr's dismissal of the Whitlam government. Federal elections were held in Australia on 13 December 1975 All 127 seats in the House of Representatives, and all 64 seats in the Senate were up for John Kerr may refer to one of the following Government and politics John Kerr (Governor-General (1914&ndash1991 Australian Governor-General John Malcolm Fraser, AC, CH (born 21 May 1930 is an Australian Liberal politician who was the 22nd Prime Minister of Australia. The Fraser caretaker government did not have the confidence of the lower house, however the parliament was dissolved a few hours after his appointment. At the election, the Fraser government was elected in its own right.
3 February 19835 March 1983Sir Ninian StephenMalcolm FraserBob HawkeThe Fraser coalition government was defeated by the Labor opposition led by Bob Hawke. Background The coalition government led by Malcolm Fraser had to contend with a parlous economic situation with high inflation and high unemployment Sir Ninian Martin Stephen KG AK GCMG GCVO KBE QC (born 15 June 1923 was the 20th Governor-General of Australia Robert James Lee (Bob Hawke, AC (born 9 December 1929 was the 23rd Prime Minister of Australia and longest serving Australian Labor Party Prime Minister
5 June 198711 July 1987Sir Ninian StephenBob HawkeJohn HowardThe Hawke government was returned, but still without a Senate majority. Federal elections were held in Australia on 11 July 1987 following the granting of a double dissolution on 5 June by the Governor-General Sir Robert James Lee (Bob Hawke, AC (born 9 December 1929 was the 23rd Prime Minister of Australia and longest serving Australian Labor Party Prime Minister See also Howard Government John Winston Howard AC (born 26 July 1939 was the 25th Prime Minister of Australia from 11 March The Australia Card bill was reintroduced and again rejected by the Senate. The Australia Card was a controversial proposal for a national identification card for Australian citizens and resident foreigners Hawke planned to hold a joint sitting, but a retired public servant Ewart Smith (1920-1991) pointed out that the Australia Card bill was unworkable due to technicalities in its wording. Even if it had been passed, it could not have been implemented[7][8]. After acknowledging this, Hawke decided not to proceed with the joint sitting, and the Australia Card bill was abandoned.

Nominations

Candidates for either House must formally nominate with the Electoral Commission. The signature of the Registered Officer of a party registered under the Electoral Act is required for a party-endorsed candidate. A registered party must have at least 500 members. Fifty signatures of eligible voters are required for an independent candidate. A deposit of $500 is required for a candidate for the House, and $1000 for a candidate for the Senate; this deposit is refunded if the candidate or group gains 4% of the first preference votes. To receive public funding, a party or candidate must receive at least 4% of the vote. [9]

References

  1. ^ Scott Bennett and Rob Lundie, 'Australian Electoral Systems', Research Paper no. 5 2007-08, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra.
  2. ^ Scott Bennett, Compulsory voting in Australian national elections, Research Brief no. 6 2005-06, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra.
  3. ^ Matt Rosenberg, Compulsory Voting, About. com: geography, retrieved September 2007.
  4. ^ What happens if I do not vote?. Voting within Australia – Frequently Asked Questions. Australian Electoral Commission. The Australian Electoral Commission, or the AEC is the federal government agency in charge of organising and supervising federal elections and referendums Retrieved on 2006-10-21. Year 2006 ( MMVI) was a Common year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. Events 1512 - Martin Luther joins the theological faculty of the University of Wittenberg.
  5. ^ Australian Electoral Commission, Electoral Pocketbook, Australian Electoral Commission, Canberra, June 2006, pp. 71-77, retrieved September 2007.
  6. ^ Note that joint sittings have sometimes occurred under different circumstances that have nothing to do with Section 57. For example, see Casual Senate vacancies in the representation of the Territories. This page is about casual vacancies in the Australian Parliament
  7. ^ University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law: Lessons from the Australia Card -- deux ex machina ?
  8. ^ University of Wollongong – The Australia Card
  9. ^ Nominations. Australian Electoral Commission. Retrieved on 2007-12-15. Year 2007 ( MMVII) was a Common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar in the 21st century. Events 533 - Byzantine general Belisarius defeats the Vandals, commanded by King Gelimer, at the Battle of

See also

External links

Albert Langer (also known as Arthur Dent) is an Australian political activist best known for his 1996 conviction and gaoling on contempt charges after
© 2009 citizendia.org; parts available under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License, from http://en.wikipedia.org
Dapyx Software network: MP3 Explorer | Ebook Manager | Zenithic