In mathematics, adjoint functors are pairs of functors which stand in a particular relationship with one another. Mathematics is the body of Knowledge and Academic discipline that studies such concepts as Quantity, Structure, Space and In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a functor is a special type of mapping between categories Such functors are ubiquitous in mathematics. The general notion of adjoint functor is studied in a branch of mathematics known as category theory. In Mathematics, category theory deals in an abstract way with mathematical Structures and relationships between them it abstracts from sets
Specifically, functors F : C → D and G : D → C between categories C and D form an adjoint pair if there is a family of bijections

which is natural in the variables X and Y. In Mathematics, a category is a fundamental and abstract way to describe mathematical entities and their relationships In Mathematics, a bijection, or a bijective function is a function f from a set X to a set Y with the property In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal The functor F is called a left adjoint functor, while G is called a right adjoint functor. The relationship “F is left adjoint to G” is sometimes written

A precise definition and several equivalent formulations are given below.
Contents |
Adjoint functors can be considered from several different points of view. This article starts with a number of introductory sections considering some of these.
The idea of an adjoint functor was formulated by Daniel Kan in 1958. Daniel Marinus Kan is a Mathematician working in Homotopy theory. Year 1958 ( MCMLVIII) was a Common year starting on Wednesday (link will display full calendar of the Gregorian calendar. Like many of the concepts in category theory, it was suggested by the needs of homological algebra, which was at the time devoted to computations. Homological algebra is the branch of Mathematics which studies homology in a general algebraic setting Those faced with giving tidy, systematic presentations of the subject would have noticed relations such as
in the category of abelian groups, where F was the functor
(i. An abelian group, also called a commutative group, is a group satisfying the additional requirement that the product of elements does not depend on their order (the e. take the tensor product with A), and G was the functor Hom(A,–). In Mathematics, the tensor product, denoted by \otimes may be applied in different contexts to vectors matrices, Tensors Vector The use of the equals sign is an abuse of notation; those two groups aren't really identical but there is a way of identifying them that is natural. In Mathematics, abuse of notation occurs when an author uses a Mathematical notation in a way that is not formally correct but that seems likely to simplify the exposition It can be seen to be natural on the basis, firstly, that these are two alternative descriptions of the bilinear mappings from X × A to Y. In Mathematics, a bilinear map is a function of two arguments that is linear in each That's something particular to the case of tensor product, though. What category theory teaches is that 'natural' is a well-defined term of art in mathematics: natural equivalence. Technical terminology is the specialized Vocabulary of a field In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal
The terminology comes from the Hilbert space idea of adjoint operators T, U with <Tx,y> = <x,Uy>, which is formally similar to the above Hom relation. This article assumes some familiarity with Analytic geometry and the concept of a limit. In Mathematics, specifically in Functional analysis, each Linear operator on a Hilbert space has a corresponding adjoint operator. We say that F is left adjoint to G, and G is right adjoint to F. Note that G may have itself a right adjoint that is quite different from F (see below for an example). The analogy to adjoint maps of Hilbert spaces can be made precise in certain contexts [1].
If one starts looking for these adjoint pairs of functors, they turn out to be very common in abstract algebra, and elsewhere as well. Abstract algebra is the subject area of Mathematics that studies Algebraic structures such as groups, rings, fields, modules The example section below provides evidence of this; furthermore, universal constructions, which may be more familiar to some, give rise to numerous adjoint pairs of functors. In various branches of Mathematics, certain constructions are frequently defined or characterised by an abstract property which requires the existence of a unique Morphism
In accordance with the thinking of Saunders Mac Lane, any idea such as adjoint functors that occurs widely enough in mathematics should be studied for its own sake. Saunders Mac Lane ( 4 August 1909, Taftville, Connecticut – 14 April 2005, San Francisco) was an American
By itself, the generality of the adjoint functor concept isn't a recommendation to most mathematicians. Concepts are judged according to their use in solving problems, at least as much as for their use in building theories. The tension between these two potential motivations for developing a mathematical concept was especially great during the 1950s when category theory was initially developed. Enter Alexander Grothendieck, who used category theory to take compass bearings in foundational, axiomatic work — in functional analysis, homological algebra and finally algebraic geometry. Experimental infobox see Wikipedia talkPersondata before changing --> Alexander Grothendieck (born March 28, 1928 in Berlin, Germany For functional analysis as used in psychology see the Functional analysis (psychology article Homological algebra is the branch of Mathematics which studies homology in a general algebraic setting Algebraic geometry is a branch of Mathematics which as the name suggests combines techniques of Abstract algebra, especially Commutative algebra, with
It is probably wrong to say that he promoted the adjoint functor concept in isolation: but recognition of the role of adjunction was inherent in Grothendieck's approach. For example, one of his major achievements was the formulation of Serre duality in relative form — one could say loosely, in a continuous family of algebraic varieties. In Algebraic geometry, a branch of Mathematics, Serre duality is a duality present on Non-singular projective algebraic varieties The entire proof turned on the existence of a right adjoint to a certain functor. This is something undeniably abstract, and non-constructive, but also powerful in its own way.
One good way to motivate adjoint functors is to explain what problem they solve, and how they solve it.
That can only be done, in some sense, by what mathematicians call 'hand-waving'. The term handwaving is an informal term that describes either the Debate technique of failing to Rigorously address an Argument in an attempt to bypass the It can be said, however, that adjoint functors pin down the concept of the best structure of a type one is interested in constructing. For example, an elementary question in ring theory is how to add a multiplicative identity to a ring that doesn't have one (the definition in this encyclopedia actually assumes one: see ring (mathematics) and glossary of ring theory). In Mathematics, ring theory is the study of rings, Algebraic structures in which addition and multiplication are defined and have similar properties to those In Mathematics, a ring is an Algebraic structure which generalizes the algebraic properties of the Integers though the rational, real Ring theory is the branch of Mathematics in which rings are studied that is structures supporting both an Addition and a Multiplication operation The best way is to add an element '1' to the ring, add nothing extra you don't need (you will need to have r+1 for r in the ring, clearly), and add no relations in the new ring that aren't forced by axioms. This is rather vague, though suggestive.
There are several ways to make precise this concept of best structure. Adjoint functors are one method; the notion of universal properties provides another, essentially equivalent but arguably more concrete approach. In various branches of Mathematics, certain constructions are frequently defined or characterised by an abstract property which requires the existence of a unique Morphism
Universal properties are also based on category theory. The idea is to set up the problem in terms of some auxiliary category C; and then identify what we want to do as showing that C has an initial object. This has an advantage that the optimisation — the sense that we are finding the best solution — is singled out and recognisable rather like the attainment of a supremum. To do it is something of a knack: for example, take the given ring R, and make a category C whose objects are ring homomorphisms R → S, with S a ring having a multiplicative identity. The morphisms in C must fill in triangles that are commutative diagrams, and preserve multiplicative identity. In mathematics and especially in Category theory a commutative diagram is a Diagram of objects also known as vertices, and Morphisms also The assertion is that C has an initial object R → R*, and R* is then the sought-after ring.
The adjoint functor method for defining a multiplicative identity for rings is to look at two categories, C0 and C1, of rings, respectively without and with assumption of multiplicative identity. There is a functor from C1 to C0 that forgets about the 1. We are seeking a left adjoint to it. This is a clear, if dry, formulation.
One way to see what is achieved by using either formulation is to try a direct method. (This is favoured, for example, by John H. Conway. John Horton Conway (born December 26, 1937, Liverpool, England) is a prolific mathematician active in the theory of finite groups ) One simply adds to R a new element 1, and calculates on the basis that any equation resulting is valid if and only if it holds for all rings that we can create from R and 1. ↔ This is the impredicative method: meaning that the ring we are trying to construct is one of the rings quantified over in 'all rings'. In Mathematics and Logic, impredicativity is the property of a self-referencing Definition.
The answer regarding the way to get a (unital) ring from one that is not unital is simple enough (see examples below); this section has been a discussion of how to formulate the question. In Mathematics, an algebra is unital (some authors say unitary) if it contains a multiplicative Identity element (or unit) i
The major argument in favour of the use of adjoint functors is probably this: if one goes through the universal property or impredicative reasoning often enough, it seems like repeating the same kind of steps.
Every partially ordered set can be viewed as a category (with a single morphism between x and y if and only if x ≤ y). In Mathematics, especially Order theory, a partially ordered set (or poset) formalizes the intuitive concept of an ordering sequencing or arrangement A pair of adjoint functors between two partially ordered sets is called a Galois connection (or, if it is contravariant, an antitone Galois connection). In Mathematics, especially in Order theory, a Galois connection is a particular correspondence between two Partially ordered sets (posets See that article for a number of examples: the case of Galois theory of course is a leading one. In Mathematics, more specifically in Abstract algebra, Galois theory, named after Évariste Galois, provides a connection between field theory Any Galois connection gives rise to closure operators and to inverse order-preserving bijections between the corresponding closed elements. A closure operator on a set S is a function cl P ( S) → P ( S) from the Power set of S
As is the case for Galois groups, the real interest lies often in refining a correspondence to a duality (i. e. antitone order isomorphism). A treatment of Galois theory along these lines by Kaplansky was influential in the recognition of the general structure here. Irving Kaplansky ( March 22, 1917 &ndash June 25, 2006) was a Canadian Mathematician.
The partial order case collapses the adjunction definitions quite noticeably, but can provide several themes:
Together these observations provide explanatory value all over mathematics.
There are a variety of equivalent ways of defining adjoint functors. We give three such definitions here. The whole picture, and the relationships between these definitions, will be given in the next section.
An adjunction between two categories C and D consists of two functors F : C → D and G : D → C and a natural isomorphism
consisting of bijections:
for all objects X in C and Y in D. In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a functor is a special type of mapping between categories In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal In Mathematics, a bijection, or a bijective function is a function f from a set X to a set Y with the property
In order to interpret Φ as a natural isomorphism, one must recognize HomD(F–, –) and HomC(–, G–) as functors. In fact, they are both bifunctors from Cop × D to Set (the category of sets). In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a functor is a special type of mapping between categories In Mathematics, the category of sets, denoted as Set, is the category whose objects are all sets and whose Morphisms are For details, see the article on Hom functors. In Mathematics, specifically in Category theory, Hom-sets ie sets of Morphisms between objects give rise to important Functors to the Category Explicitly, the naturality of Φ means that for all morphisms f : X ′ → X in C and all morphisms g : Y → Y ′ in D the following diagram commutes:

The horizontal arrows in this diagram are those induced by f and g. In Mathematics, a morphism is an abstraction derived from structure-preserving mappings between two Mathematical structures The study of morphisms and In mathematics and especially in Category theory a commutative diagram is a Diagram of objects also known as vertices, and Morphisms also
An adjunction between two categories C and D is given by a functor G : D → C together with a universal morphism (FX, ηX) from X to G for each X in C. In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a functor is a special type of mapping between categories In various branches of Mathematics, certain constructions are frequently defined or characterised by an abstract property which requires the existence of a unique Morphism The assignment
defines a functor F : C → D called the left adjoint of G. The morphisms ηX form the components of a natural transformation η : 1C → GF called the unit of the adjunction. In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal
Dually, an adjunction between two categories C and D is given by a functor F : C → D together with a universal morphism (GY, εY) from F to Y for each Y in D. In Category theory, an abstract branch of Mathematics, the dual category or opposite category C op of a category C is the The assignment
defines a functor G : D → C called the right adjoint of F. The morphisms εY form the components of a natural transformation ε : FG → 1D called the counit of the adjunction.
An adjunction between two categories C and D consists of two functors F : C → D and G : D → C and two natural transformations

called the unit and the counit of the adjunction, respectively. In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a functor is a special type of mapping between categories In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal These must satisfy

where 1F and 1G are the identity transformations on F and G respectively (i. e. the transformations whose components are all identity morphisms). These equations are sometimes called the zig-zag equations because of the appearance of the corresponding string diagrams. In Category theory, string diagrams are a way of representing 2-cells in 2-categories. In component form these equations are

for each X in C and each Y in D.
There are numerous functors and natural transformations associated with every adjunction, and there exists an intricate web of relationships among these objects. These relationships allow one to determine all of the data based on knowledge of only some of the pieces.
An adjunction between categories C and D consists of
The web of relationships between these functors and transformations can be neatly summarized by a family of commutative diagrams. In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a functor is a special type of mapping between categories In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal In mathematics and especially in Category theory a commutative diagram is a Diagram of objects also known as vertices, and Morphisms also Let X be an object in C and Y an object in D. Then for every morphism f : X → G(Y) there is a unique morphism g : F(X) → Y such that the following two diagrams commute:

Likewise, for every g : F(X) → Y there is a unique f : X → G(Y) such that the above diagrams commute. Each adjunction, therefore, gives rise to a family of universal morphisms:
The morphisms f and g in the above diagrams are related by the natural isomorphism Φ, which for each X in C and Y in D gives a bijection

such that

If either the unit and counit are given then these equations can be used to define Φ.
We consider two special cases of the above diagrams:
If Y = F(X) then HomD(F(X),Y) contains the identity morphism. The corresponding element of HomC(X,G(Y)) is just the unit ηX. That is, if Y = F(X) and g = idF(X), then f = ηX so that

The first of these equations gives η in terms of Φ. The second, holding for all X in C, is equivalent to the statement that the composition

is equal to the identity transformation from F to F.
If X = G(Y) then HomC(X,G(Y)) contains the identity morphism. The corresponding element of HomD(F(X),Y) is just the counit εY. That is, if X = G(Y) and f = idG(Y), then g = εY so that

The second of these equations gives ε in terms of Φ, while the first, holding for all Y in D, is equivalent to the statement that the composition

is equal to the identity transformation from G to G.
If the functor F : C → D has two right adjoints G1 and G2, then G1 and G2 are naturally isomorphic. In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one Functor into another while respecting the internal The same is true for left adjoints.
Conversely, if F is left adjoint to G1, and G1 is naturally isomorphic to G2 then F is also left adjoint to G2. More generally, if 〈F, G, η, ε〉 is an adjunction and
are natural isomorphisms then 〈F′, G′, η′, ε′〉 is an adjunction where

Here
denotes vertical composition of natural transformations, and
denotes horizontal composition.
Adjunctions can be composed in a natural fashion. Specifically, if 〈F1, G1, η1, ε1〉 is an adjunction between C and D and 〈F2, G2, η2, ε2〉 is an adjunction between D and E then the functor

is left adjoint to

The unit and the counit of this adjunction are given by the compositions:

One can then form a category whose objects are all small categories and whose morphisms are adjunctions. In Mathematics, a category is a fundamental and abstract way to describe mathematical entities and their relationships
The most important property of adjoints is their continuity: every functor that has a left adjoint (and therefore is a right adjoint) is continuous (i. e. commutes with limits in the category theoretical sense); every functor that has a right adjoint (and therefore is a left adjoint) is cocontinuous (i. In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, the abstract notion of a limit captures the essential properties of universal constructions that are used in various parts e. commutes with colimits). In Category theory, a branch of Mathematics, the abstract notion of a limit captures the essential properties of universal constructions that are used in various parts
Since many common constructions in mathematics are limits or colimits, this provides a wealth of information. For example:
If C and D are preadditive categories and F : C → D is an additive functor with a right adjoint G : D → C, then G is also an additive functor and the Hom-set bijections

are, in fact, isomorphisms of abelian groups. In Mathematics, specifically in Category theory, a preadditive category is a category that is enriched over the Monoidal category In Mathematics, specifically in Category theory, a preadditive category is a category that is enriched over the Monoidal category Dually, if G is additive with a left adjoint F, then F is also additive.
Moreover, if both C and D are additive categories (i. In Mathematics, specifically in Category theory, an additive category is a Preadditive category C such that any finitely many objects A e. preadditive categories with all finite biproducts), then any pair of adjoint functors between them are automatically additive. In Category theory and its applications to Mathematics, a biproduct is a generalisation of the notion of Direct sum that makes sense in any Preadditive
Not every functor G : D → C admits a left adjoint. If D is complete, then the functors with left adjoints can be characterized by the adjoint functor theorem of Peter J. Freyd: G has a left adjoint if and only if it is continuous and a certain smallness condition is satisfied: for every object X of C there exists a family of morphisms
where the indices i come from a set I, not a proper class, such that every morphism
can be written as
for some i in I and some morphism
An analogous statement characterizes those functors with a right adjoint.
As stated earlier, an adjunction between categories C and D gives rise to a family of universal morphisms, one for each object in C and one for each object in D. In various branches of Mathematics, certain constructions are frequently defined or characterised by an abstract property which requires the existence of a unique Morphism Conversely, if there exists a universal morphism to a functor G : D → C from every object of C, then G has a left adjoint.
However, universal constructions are more general than adjoint functors: a universal construction is like an optimization problem; it gives rise to an adjoint pair if and only if this problem has a solution for every object of C (equivalently, every object of D).
Every equivalence of categories defines an adjunction. In Category theory, an abstract branch of Mathematics, an equivalence of categories is a relation between two categories that establishes that these categories are If F : C → D and G : D → C are functors with natural isomorphisms η : 1C → GF and ε : FG → 1D then (F, G) form an adjoint pair with unit η and counit ε. Conversely, an adjunction 〈F, G, η, ε〉 defines an equivalence of categories if and only if, the unit and counit are natural isomorphisms (and not just natural transformations).
If (F, G) define an equivalence of categories, then F is not only a left adjoint of G but a right adjoint as well. Explicitly, if 〈F, G, η, ε〉 is an adjoint equivalence then so is 〈G, F, ε−1, η−1〉.
Every adjunction 〈F, G, η, ε〉 extends an equivalence of certain subcategories. Define C1 as the full subcategory of C consisting of those objects X of C for which ηX is an isomorphism, and define D1 as the full subcategory of D consisting of those objects Y of D for which εY is an isomorphism. In Mathematics, a subcategory of a category C is a category S whose objects are objects in C and whose morphisms are morphisms in Then F and G can be restricted to C1 and D1 and yield inverse equivalences of these subcategories.
In a sense, then, adjoints are "generalized" inverses. Note however that a right inverse of F (i. e. a functor G such that FG is naturally isomorphic to 1D) need not be a right (or left) adjoint of F. Adjoints generalize two-sided inverses.
Every adjunction 〈F, G, η, ε〉 gives rise to an associated monad 〈T, η, μ〉 in the category C. In Category theory, a monad or triple is an (endo- Functor, together with two associated Natural transformations They are important in the theory The functor

is given by T = GF. The unit

is just the unit η of the adjunction and the multiplication transformation

is given by μ = GεF. Dually, the triple 〈FG, ε, FηG〉 defines a comonad in D. In Category theory, a monad or triple is an (endo- Functor, together with two associated Natural transformations They are important in the theory
Every monad arises from some adjunction—in fact, typically from many adjunctions—in the above fashion. Two constructions, called the category of Eilenberg-Moore algebras and the Kleisli category are two extremal solutions to the problem of constructing an adjunction that gives rise to a given monad. In Category theory, a monad or triple is an (endo- Functor, together with two associated Natural transformations They are important in the theory In Category theory, a monad or triple is an (endo- Functor, together with two associated Natural transformations They are important in the theory